Gawa kayo ng poll mga boss para naman satisfied ninyo mga sarili ninyo.
Matagal na yang batas na yan may nagawa ba???
Wala na bang masabi to support the argument?Gawa kayo ng poll mga boss para naman satisfied ninyo mga sarili ninyo.
Philippine laws are there to protect every Filipino, regardless of their religion, race, or whatsoever. May nagagawa yan, hindi mo alam?Matagal na yang batas na yan may nagawa ba???
never naman talaga yan naging equal bossing since the constitution na mismo nag break ng equality when it said na "presumed" na lang ang innocence ng accused
With that being said, dapat ibasura ang equality since hindi naman nasusunod at some point?
if nanlaban ang adik boss at nabaril ng pulis ay EJK pa din ang ginawa ng pulis since kahit self-defense pa yan it doesn't deny the fact na napatay pa din ang accused without a trial, kaya nga wala tayong batas that bans EJK, at yung mga pulis na pumatay kay Kian was judged under murder and not EJK
Anu pa ba ededefend ko sa stand ko boss. Clear as day. As long as di mo naeexperience nangyayari sa laylayan sa inyo na yang human rights ninyo
Puro ka human rights. Druga ang problema ng bansa.
i'd rather say a pseudo-equality since it saved the accused from being judged early by requiring people to deceive themselves that criminals are still innocent
Ikaw na ang nagsabi, self-defense dahil nanlaban. Sa law, may tinatawag na scope and limitations.
More gaslighting. LOLAnu pa ba ededefend ko sa stand ko boss. Clear as day. As long as di mo naeexperience nangyayari sa laylayan sa inyo na yang human rights ninyo
Halata namang wala kang alam sa nangyayari sa laylayan eh.
Ikaw ang naunang bumanggit ng human rights. Nabanggit na yan lalo during the discussing about your stand ng pagiging safe ng bansa due to crimes.
self-defense still does not deny the fact that the accused was killed without a trial bossing, so kahit kailan EJK isn't penalized under law but murder is already successful in separating intentional killing and self-defense (unintentional)
Lol. Sinabi ko lang naman ang laman ng article since tinanong mo. Paulit ulit
Nasaan ang bill of rights? Are you saying na sundin ang batas kung naaayon sa atin?
Self-defense – refers to a justifying circumstance wherein no criminal liability results for a crime committed by an accused who acted in self-defending.
actually the one we are talking is already the bill of rights bossing, the constitution required people to lie to themselves about criminals being innocent as part of the bill of rights
Assuming na gaslighting pa. Wala na bang iba?Lol. Sinabi ko lang naman ang laman ng article since tinanong mo. Paulit ulit
As if concern na concern sa buhay sa laylayan eh bihira namang may nangyayaring krimen sa isang katulad mong rich kid. Maniniwala lang ako sayo kung lumaki ka sa laylayan
kaya nga sabi ko murder is already successful in distinguishing between a self-defense (unintentional) and the intentional
Again, may scope and limitations ang bill of rights, we have laws to support each.
Kaso lang naman ni Kean pinagbubuchi ng mga yan. Pero pagtinanong mo sa ibang case ng EJK. AH BASTA MERON NAMANG EJK DAW. Kahit di naman link sa drugs basta ejk si digong padin may kasalanan
and then?
Kaya nga. Going back to your argument, kapag napatay ang isang kriminal as an act of self defense, nasa justifying circumstances yan
the police officers were never charged with EJK kasi walang batas against EJK, they were charged with murder instead
PH