🕯️ Traditions Meme of the Day!

Gildarts Tale

Established
1.webp
 
That is actually funny! The male of 1940's were so convinced that they need to kill to prove their manhood. It must suck to find out that males today do not pursue the same thing they desperately wanted to gain.
 
Really?? Yan ang takeaway mo jan?? Na boys did that to kill??
Boys desperatwly wanted to prove themselves to be men by going to war, which unfortunately includes killing. This is a product of the old archetype of what a man should be.

In the era of modern warfare, this gender stereotype of masculinity does not serve any purpose anymore.
 
That is actually funny! The male of 1940's were so convinced that they need to kill to prove their manhood. It must suck to find out that males today do not pursue the same thing they desperately wanted to gain.


Yes, is suck to find that we reduce men now a days as weak as clowns because we are thought that masculinity is toxic, and the reason for past atrocities.

And here we are 2024 boys are so weak they pretend playing house to be a girl just to compete with woman's sport. We have a grown up man, identify as 6 years old girl, just to scape his responsibility as a father. The woke clowns and together with the simp says "sLaY gIrL".

Boys desperatwly wanted to prove themselves to be men by going to war, which unfortunately includes killing. This is a product of the old archetype of what a man should be.

In the era of modern warfare, this gender stereotype of masculinity does not serve any purpose anymore.
And I bet, when war will broke again in this modern era, woke boys simp will run like babies and shit their pants.
 
And here we are 2024 boys are so weak they pretend playing house to be a girl just to compete with woman's sport. We have a grown up man, identify as 6 years old girl, just to scape his responsibility as a father. The woke clowns and together with the simp says "sLaY gIrL".
1, who raised these people up again?
2, this is a result of the privilege and discriminatory norms we have in existing culture assigned to genders. Pag nawala na ang belief na military is predominantly a man's role, it would not matter what people identify as. This will simply be every citizen role regardless of gender.

Besides it will open up the door for people to get in according to their interest and skills, and military will no longer be a dumpster of boys who can't handle school, as it would be an actual profession.
 
Boys desperatwly wanted to prove themselves to be men by going to war, which unfortunately includes killing. This is a product of the old archetype of what a man should be.

In the era of modern warfare, this gender stereotype of masculinity does not serve any purpose anymore.
Or they just wanna fight or defend their country.. may aspeto din jan ng patriotism.. even some pa nga for economic reasons kaya nagjoin.. may iba sguro prestige pa.. pero kung sasabihin mo lang na they just wanted to kill or prove themselves as men eh such a disservice sa ginawa nilang pakikipaglaban.. thats insulting na sa mga sacrifices nila
 
That is actually funny! The male of 1940's were so convinced that they need to kill to prove their manhood. It must suck to find out that males today do not pursue the same thing they desperately wanted to gain.

so wrong, what a shame for those who fought against the Axis of evil. dahil lang gusto mo kumontra sa opinion ni TS...
 
Or they just wanna fight or defend their country.. may aspeto din jan ng patriotism.. even some pa nga for economic reasons kaya nagjoin.. may iba sguro prestige pa.. pero kung sasabihin mo lang na they just wanted to kill or prove themselves as men eh such a disservice sa ginawa nilang pakikipaglaban.. thats insulting na sa mga sacrifices nila
That is really what it boils down to taking away the socially constructed meaning of the act. Patriotism is just nationalism, but in more palatable form. It is a product of the artificial differentiation of human groups that justifies killing other humans.

This is actually the profound realization ng kanta ni John Lennon na Imagine. We have created social constructs that justifies acts that would have been evil in any other context, and much worst, frame it as necessary evil to the point that we define it as good.

It is not to insult them. They are victims too as much as those they fought. They are victims of the societies we built. Isnt it much more of a disservice kung hahayaan lang natin masayang ang sacrifices nila by creating more men who can only find purpose in war?

so wrong, what a shame for those who fought against the Axis of evil. dahil lang gusto mo kumontra sa opinion ni TS...
Wala akong makitang argument sa comment me. I guess you just want to feel better about yourself.. more powers
 
1, who raised these people up again?
2, this is a result of the privilege and discriminatory norms we have in existing culture assigned to genders. Pag nawala na ang belief na military is predominantly a man's role, it would not matter what people identify as. This will simply be every citizen role regardless of gender.

Besides it will open up the door for people to get in according to their interest and skills, and military will no longer be a dumpster of boys who can't handle school, as it would be an actual profession.
Who raised them? Weak people like our society.

It's the result of insisting the assigned gender is not based on biology. Di na mawala yan kasi men will always have more strength than women, wag ka nang mabuhay sa delusions just to justify this woke ideology.

As if walang mga lalaki that are skillful sa kahit anong field. Lol! Being a military is an important role and to be proud of. I get it that your coward that your afraid of war.
 
Ano problema sa woke? Ang woke po ay aware po siya sa social injustices na nangyayari sa society. Kung hindi aware sa mga ayaw, that means wala sila pakialam or tanggap nila po ang ano man nakadestine na kapalaran mismo. E yung woke, hindi naman. Sinusolusyonan po nila ang hindi makatarungan na nangyayari po. Pinamumulat at saka isa pa, when men protect their own land, of course, they need to kill or they must learn how to kill which is ayaw ng ibang lalake po! Hindi lahat gusto ang ganoon pamamaraan at ang iba na sumasabak sa war ay nagkakaroon ng PSTD disorder, okay?

Is it a reason why some they consider as toxic masculinity po. Yung feeling na they do not like it at all but no choice but to accept the fate na doon ang bagsak nila lalo na ang ibang tao na ipinagtutulakan na sumabak sa war dahil lalake sila.

Its like woman to be submissive, wala sila choice but to accept the fate na hanggang diyan lang sila kapag naging assertive sila or sabihin dominant, and sabihin lumampas diyan sa expectation na dapat andoon lang siya, some would not acceptable sa kanila.

It is a reason why ayaw ng feminism huh? Rights nila kase that we can be whatever we want at hindi nag eestay sa ideal ng men and women only na dapat gampanan as their role.

Iyan ang reason why ayaw ng feminism dahil gusto nila manigurado kung saan dapat nawawasto pwesto ang lalake at babae po bilang kung ano dapat para sa kanila.

Ganun.

And the reason why na naman po na ganun sila mag ayaw sa mga kung ano man group na iyon? Simple. Nakabased na naman po sila sa biological uli. Na naman. Uli.​
 
As if walang mga lalaki that are skillful sa kahit anong field.
Tha is not what I said. Traditionally, The primary critiria for going to war was physical strength and any other skill was just extra. Gaya ng sinabi mo dito.
Di na mawala yan kasi men will always have more strength than women, wag ka nang mabuhay sa delusions just to justify this woke ideology.

But brute strength will lose its value as the warfare landscape changes. While it will still be important, other skills will also be important. Mawawala na ang idea na "manliness" makes a better fit for warfare.

Honestly, women were always strong enough. But, gaya ng claim mo sa buong genratiin, women were always raised to optimize them for procreation for several generations.

It is not that I am afraid of war, san galing yun? I am just saying, the people of the past fought and died for peace. Ikaw ba gusto mo ng war? Did it Make you feel manly calling me a coward? Thanks for proving my point.
 
But brute strength will lose its value as the warfare landscape changes. While it will still be important, other skills will also be important. Mawawala na ang idea na "manliness" makes a better fit for warfare.

Honestly, women were always strong enough. But, gaya ng claim mo sa buong genratiin, women were always raised to optimize them for procreation for several generations.

It is not that I am afraid of war, san galing yun? I am just saying, the people of the past fought and died for peace. Ikaw ba gusto mo ng war? Did it Make you feel manly calling me a coward? Thanks for proving my point.
Nope it will not lose its values, kahit pa anong advancement pa yan sa technology. Men will just adopt with the needed skills and brutes.

I did not claim anything about women being optimized for procreation.

You did not say that the people of the past fought ad died for peace. You never said that, kasi ina-undervalued mo yung role na mga sundalo as if para lang sa ego nila for killing.

woke simper ka of course same ka din nila afraid of this masculinity as the same as war. as who you support with same ka rin nila. just saying.
 
Haha. Sabi "afraid of this masculinity" pero ako naman , inisip-isip ko na threatened by "femininity" ang mga nag-aayaw.... hahaha :LOL: Naging battle of the sexes ang resulta kahit hindi naman literal na gender ang nag-aaway. Yung concept lang ang essence of masculinity and femininity ang nagcoconflict kung ano dapat eaccept kung ano ang kinoconsider good idealogies.​
 
I did not claim anything about women being optimized for procreation.
Because i was the one putting forward the claim.
You did not say that the people of the past fought ad died for peace. You never said that, kasi ina-undervalued mo yung role na mga sundalo as if para lang sa ego nila for killing.
I just think it will be less respectful for their cause to glorify war like this meme. They fought this war to protect everyone's pursuit to happiness. To frame the liberal idea as weakness is naive and shallow.
 
That is really what it boils down to taking away the socially constructed meaning of the act. Patriotism is just nationalism, but in more palatable form. It is a product of the artificial differentiation of human groups that justifies killing other humans.

This is actually the profound realization ng kanta ni John Lennon na Imagine. We have created social constructs that justifies acts that would have been evil in any other context, and much worst, frame it as necessary evil to the point that we define it as good.

It is not to insult them. They are victims too as much as those they fought. They are victims of the societies we built. Isnt it much more of a disservice kung hahayaan lang natin masayang ang sacrifices nila by creating more men who can only find purpose in war?


Wala akong makitang argument sa comment me. I guess you just want to feel better about yourself.. more powers
wala talaga, kasi maling mali.
That is actually funny! The male of 1940's were so convinced that they need to kill to prove their manhood.
 
That is really what it boils down to taking away the socially constructed meaning of the act. Patriotism is just nationalism, but in more palatable form. It is a product of the artificial differentiation of human groups that justifies killing other humans.

This is actually the profound realization ng kanta ni John Lennon na Imagine. We have created social constructs that justifies acts that would have been evil in any other context, and much worst, frame it as necessary evil to the point that we define it as good.

It is not to insult them. They are victims too as much as those they fought. They are victims of the societies we built. Isnt it much more of a disservice kung hahayaan lang natin masayang ang sacrifices nila by creating more men who can only find purpose in war?


Wala akong makitang argument sa comment me. I guess you just want to feel better about yourself.. more powers
No it doesn’t. War happens for many reasons..some justified..some not.. pero kung outright sasabihin mo na people who participated in eh were just out there to kill and prove their manhood is really really insulting for me. Mas maganda kung walang war..pero when it does happen i would call those people brave..taking the life of another being takes a toll on people no matter the cause. Kaya nga ang dami may PTSD after their service eh… wag mo nmn sabihin na gusto lang nila pumatay para lang di masira ang argument mo in favor of the lgbtq

I just think it will be less respectful for their cause to glorify war like this meme. They fought this war to protect everyone's pursuit to happiness. To frame the liberal idea as weakness is naive and shallow.
Kung eto sana initial reply mo mas maaappreciate ko pa ung point mo eh
 

Similar threads

About this Thread

  • 29
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 7
    Participants
Last reply from:
Asherah Goddess

New Topics

Online now

Members online
501
Guests online
1,426
Total visitors
1,927

Forum statistics

Threads
2,274,154
Posts
28,953,907
Members
1,235,102
Latest member
HypnotizingLynx21
Back
Top