Read full article: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
Third of four parts
THE third-biggest lie over our South China Sea (SCS) disputes with China has been disseminated in the Hitlerian tactic that a fallacy repeated again and again would be believed as truth.
Indeed, nearly all media reports on our SCS quarrel contain versions of the following statement: "The Philippines sued China before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 2013 over the country's claims in the West Philippine Sea. In July 2016, the court ruled in favor of the Philippines and rejected China's nine-dash claim, covering almost the entire South China Sea."
That's from a May 24, 2024 report in the Daily Tribune, ironically a paper financed and put up by the officials and supporters of former president Rodrigo Duterte, who called that "court's" ruling a worthless piece of paper.
Full article here: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Third of four parts
THE third-biggest lie over our South China Sea (SCS) disputes with China has been disseminated in the Hitlerian tactic that a fallacy repeated again and again would be believed as truth.
Indeed, nearly all media reports on our SCS quarrel contain versions of the following statement: "The Philippines sued China before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 2013 over the country's claims in the West Philippine Sea. In July 2016, the court ruled in favor of the Philippines and rejected China's nine-dash claim, covering almost the entire South China Sea."
That's from a May 24, 2024 report in the Daily Tribune, ironically a paper financed and put up by the officials and supporters of former president Rodrigo Duterte, who called that "court's" ruling a worthless piece of paper.
Full article here: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.