Ping!Ping!Ping!Ping! By Chef Boy Morales.

Kaya pala. May beef pala si Ping kay Morales?

Well, si Ping naman ay psaok sa mga napipisil diumano ng admin for their Senatorial lineup next year. Alangan naman papanig siya sa dati na niyang kaaway vs his possible financier, diba?

Meanwhile in the past distance land:

Di ka nalang sana nagsalita Mr.Kuratong Baliling.

 

[ZummerSoltice]

Like what I've said we cannot rely on mere hearsay, even freshmen law students knows this. Siya lang ang nag napapatunay ng documents at wala nang iba.

Meron namang mga pirma. Hindi lang naman sya yung andun.

 

[BicycleHorse]

Meron namang mga pirma. Hindi lang naman sya yung andun.

They are just signatures, and namention ko na ito galing kay Chiz.

Sinabi rin ni Chiz na testimonies in hearings should be limited to the witness's personal knowledge and that any information received from others should be verified by inviting those individuals to the hearing.

 

[ZummerSoltice]

They are just signatures, and namention ko na ito galing kay Chiz.

Kaso yung pinatawag sa hearing hindi sumipot dahil may covid.

Ang dami sanang maisiwalat si morales kung hindi lang sana sa mga senador na puro satsat. Halos nililihis yung issue. Limited lang talaga screentime nya. Halos lahat tag team for character assassination.

 

[BicycleHorse]

Kaso yung pinatawag sa hearing hindi sumipot dahil may covid.

Ang dami sanang maisiwalat si morales kung hindi lang sana sa mga senador na puro satsat. Halos nililihis yung issue. Limited lang talaga screentime nya. Halos lahat tag team for character assassination.

Wala rin sense yung isisiwalat pa niya kung walang supporting evidence siyang hawak or may tao nag nagpapatunay na totoo yung document na hawak niya.

 

[ZummerSoltice]

Wala rin sense yung isisiwalat pa niya kung walang supporting evidence siyang hawak or may tao nag nagpapatunay na totoo yung document na hawak niya.

Di rin naman macacater yung isisiwalat nya dahil nga one sided yung ibang senador. Instead magfocus dun sa leak puro character assassination ginagawa. Paanu pa masisiwalat yung ibang issue kung dami nilang kuskos balungos. Imbes na maliliwanagan sana sa issue. Ay wala na. Natatabonan na.

 

[BicycleHorse]

Di rin naman macacater yung isisiwalat nya dahil nga one sided yung ibang senador. Instead magfocus dun sa leak puro character assassination ginagawa. Paanu pa masisiwalat yung ibang issue kung dami nilang kuskos balungos. Imbes na maliliwanagan sana sa issue. Ay wala na. Natatabonan na.

The senators are just doing their jobs. If you watch the hearing yesterday. Zubiri reminded his colleagues to be careful in the conduct of public inquiries, which he said should not be used for political persecution. And also pointed out that "very serious accusations have been made" without evidence.

 

[ZummerSoltice]

The senators are just doing their jobs. If you watch the hearing yesterday. Zubiri reminded his colleagues to be careful in the conduct of public inquiries, which he said should not be used for political persecution. And also pointed out that "very serious accusations have been made" without evidence.

Yah. Narinig ko ung useless na pinagsasabi nya. Halatang rigged naman. Dun palang sa isang pinatawag na ngkacovid. Like wtf. Covid sa panahon ngayon.

I mean di naman tayo Pinanganak kahapon right?

 

[BicycleHorse]

Yah. Narinig ko ung useless na pinagsasabi nya. Halatang rigged naman. Dun palang sa isang pinatawag na ngkacovid. Like wtf. Covid sa panahon ngayon.

I mean di naman tayo Pinanganak kahapon right?

You mean useless yung pag iingat? Credibility ng Senate ang nakasalalay dito dahil maraming pilipino naka subaybay sa hearing to find out whether this true or not. Isang pagkakamali lang madudungisan ulit ang credibility nila.

 

[ZummerSoltice]

You mean useless yung pag iingat? Credibility ng Senate ang nakasalalay dito dahil maraming pilipino naka subaybay dito. Isang pagkakamali lang madudungisan agad ang credibility nila sa senado.

Jeez. Credibility... Matagal ng patay since namatay c Miriam Santiago. Simula nuon wala na. Sa admin ba ngayon meron bang magandang naidulot yung Senate hearing?Puro papogi lang naman ah. In aid of legislation.

Yung lotto ni Tulfo anyare?wala. Maganda lang sa simula. Yung kay quibuloy?parang lang baliw si Risa kakahanap kay Quibuloy.

 

[BicycleHorse]

Sa admin ba ngayon meron bang magandang naidulot yung Senate hearing?Puro papogi lang naman ah. In aid of legislation.

Kasama na rin PDEA leaks right?

 

[ZummerSoltice]

Kasama na rin PDEA leaks right?

Well yes. Dahil sa mga senatong na wala namang kwenta. Inaantay sana yan ng taong bayan. Malaman yung totoo kaso just for a show lang pala. Yung akala mo para sa bayan ay di pala. Papogi pala para sa susunod na election.

 

[BicycleHorse]

Well yes. Dahil sa mga senatong na wala namang kwenta. Inaantay sana yan ng taong bayan. Malaman yung totoo kaso just for a show lang pala. Yung akala mo para sa bayan ay di pala. Papogi pala para sa susunod na election.

Like what I said before ginagawa lang nila trabaho nila. Hindi naman sila nag aral ng law at politics para maniwala sila sa mere heasay.

 

[plhbg1]

Taga process lang naman si Morales kasi nga meron syang informant nagsasabi na ganito ganyan nakunan nya ng picture at video c maricel at c bangag. Ngayon napirmahan nat lahat lahat hindi natuloy pinigilan ng higher ups.


Kaya nga eh. Kaso halata namang ngsisinungaling din ung mga surprise witness ng kabilang kampo.

Halata talaga na sinungaling sa galaw palang.
Pinatanggal pala yan ni pduts dahil daming ginawang kagag0hàn.View attachment 2958598View attachment 2958599View attachment 2958600View attachment 2958601

basta mga santiago maraming kaso, sino kaya sa kanila mas maraming kaso? di naman daw sila magkakilala hehe

Yes and because of that hindi natin masasabi na substantial evidence yung hawak niyang mga files na iprinesent niya kay Bato. First off, lack of supporting evidence, Zubiri already pointed out that Morales lacked evidence to support his claims, and the allegations were solely based on his testimony, which could be considered hearsay.

Sinabi rin ni Chiz na testimonies in hearings should be limited to the witness's personal knowledge and that any information received from others should be verified by inviting those individuals to the hearing. This implies that personal files, especially if they lack corroborating evidence or are based on hearsay, may not hold substantial weight in the investigation.

paulit ulit ka lang sa ganyang argument, eh sinabihan ka na nga na ibibigay ni maharlika directly yung original copy ng authority to operate with attached pictures babarahin mo naman na leaking ulet haha naka loop ka lang para kang programmed troll

They are just signatures, and namention ko na ito galing kay Chiz.

eto boss pasabog ko sayo that in case of absence of the original documents, the best proof of authenticity is the testimony of the one who prepared the said document, i-sampal mo yan sa bangag na handler mo, supreme court decision yan for G.R. No. 199451

wag mang troll dito na isang argument lang ang dala mo, damihan mo naman para masaya tayo

 

[BicycleHorse]

basta mga santiago maraming kaso, sino kaya sa kanila mas maraming kaso? di naman daw sila magkakilala hehe

Can you tell kung ilan na yung mga kaso nila na naka appeal, pending, or mga na dismiss na?

paulit ulit ka lang sa ganyang argument, eh sinabihan ka na nga na ibibigay ni maharlika directly yung original copy ng authority to operate with attached pictures babarahin mo naman na leaking ulet haha naka loop ka lang para kang programmed troll

Did I mention leaked documents there? Sinabi ko lang personal files.

eto boss pasabog ko sayo that in case of absence of the original documents, the best proof of authenticity is the testimony of the one who prepared the said document, i-sampal mo yan sa bangag na handler mo, supreme court decision yan for G.R. No. 199451

Morales can't use the Supreme Court ruling in G.R. No. 199451, which is not directly relevant or applicable to the PDEA Leaks case being investigated by the Senate because of the following:

1. G.R. No. 199451 was a civil case involving an action for sum of money, not a legislative inquiry like the Senate probe on the PDEA Leaks
2. The ruling discussed whether photocopies can be used as evidence when the original documents are not available. It stated that a case can still succeed even if the original document is not shown in court, as long as the contents can be proven through secondary evidence. The Senate has specific procedures and requirements for accepting evidence to support claims made during the investigation.
3. While the testimony of the person who prepared a document can be considered strong evidence of authenticity in the absence of the original, the credibility and reliability of the witness are crucial factors. The Senate may have additional criteria for evaluating the weight of such testimony.
4. The Supreme Court ruling does not automatically make Morales' personal documents admissible or his testimony sufficient proof of the PDEA Leaks documents' authenticity in the Senate probe. The Senate committee will assess the evidence based on its own standards and procedures.

Additionally, chill lang tayo. I follow the Politics Forum Rules and Guidelines here from Sir Draft. I'm stating my thoughts and opinions here. I respect your opinion and I do not intend to troll or insult you.

 

[plhbg1]

Can you tell kung ilan na yung mga kaso nila na naka appeal, pending, or mga na dismiss na?


Did I mention leaked documents there? Sinabi ko lang personal files.


Morales can't use the Supreme Court ruling in G.R. No. 199451, which is not directly relevant or applicable to the PDEA Leaks case being investigated by the Senate because of the following:

1. G.R. No. 199451 was a civil case involving an action for sum of money, not a legislative inquiry like the Senate probe on the PDEA Leaks
2. The ruling discussed whether photocopies can be used as evidence when the original documents are not available. It stated that a case can still succeed even if the original document is not shown in court, as long as the contents can be proven through secondary evidence. The Senate has specific procedures and requirements for accepting evidence to support claims made during the investigation.
3. While the testimony of the person who prepared a document can be considered strong evidence of authenticity in the absence of the original, the credibility and reliability of the witness are crucial factors. The Senate may have additional criteria for evaluating the weight of such testimony.
4. The Supreme Court ruling does not automatically make Morales' personal documents admissible or his testimony sufficient proof of the PDEA Leaks documents' authenticity in the Senate probe. The Senate committee will assess the evidence based on its own standards and procedures.

Additionally, chill lang tayo. I follow the Politics Forum Rules and Guidelines here from Sir Draft. I'm stating my thoughts and opinions here. I respect your opinion and I do not intend to troll or insult you.

nag itemize ka pa talaga eh isa lang argument mo: it's in the senate and it's not in the supreme court hehe but anyways, at least if iko-contest nila yan sa court alam na natin kung anu rules doon

 

[BicycleHorse]

nag itemize ka pa talaga eh isa lang argument mo: it's in the senate and it's not in the supreme court hehe but anyways, at least if iko-contest nila yan sa court alam na natin kung anu rules doon

Actually pwede naman nila idirect yan sa court kung gusto talaga nila para hindi masayang yung oras na inilaan ng committee para dito.

 

[plhbg1]

Actually pwede naman nila idirect yan sa court kung gusto talaga nila para hindi masayang yung oras na inilaan ng committee para dito.

pero magiging prosecution na, eh ang gusto ni bato legislation lang eh, wala siyang paki kahit bangag si babyM, importante di na maulit para if ever si bato na president aba di na mangyayari ito sa kanya hehe

 

[BicycleHorse]

pero magiging prosecution na, eh ang gusto ni bato legislation lang eh, wala siyang paki kahit bangag si babyM, importante di na maulit para if ever si bato na president aba di na mangyayari ito sa kanya hehe

Like I said before whether the President is found involved or not, nakasalalay dito yung reputation and integrity ng senate and yung mga tao na involve dito.

 

[plhbg1]

Like I said before whether the President is found involved or not, nakasalalay dito yung reputation and integrity ng senate and yung mga tao na involve dito.

may reputation pa pala ang senate bossing? before pa nag hearing pinasabog na ni Maharlika na di papayagan ng admin na mag appear si James Kumar dahil maraming senador ang madadamay, at nagka-totoo nga walang Kumar na umattend, closed na lahat ng socials ni Kumar