I Told You So.

Stupid Tarriela, admitting the PH vessels crossed the red line of China's Bajo de Masinloc territorial sea

- Remarks of the Spokesperson of the Chinese Embassy in the Philippines
On PCG and BFAR Vessels Intruding into the Adjacent Waters of Huangyan Dao on April 30th

Q: On the 1st of May, Spokesperson Jay Tarriela from PCG said during a Press Briefing that “since the time of President Bongbong Marcos, we (the Philippines) have already crossed the red line of Bajo de Masinloc (Huangyan Dao). Before, during the previous administration, these government vessels are always not crossing the 12 nautical mile mark of the Bajo de Masinloc. But for President Bongbong Marcos, we have crossed that red line.” What is your comment on this?
A: Exactly as this PCG spokesperson has said, the Philippines has crossed the red line on the issue of Huangyan Dao. According to the temporary special arrangements by the Chinese side in 2016, Filipino fishermen can fish with small fishing boats in designated waters except the lagoon of Huangyan Dao,while the AFP, PCG and other Philippine government vessels and aircrafts should refrain from entering the 12 nautical miles and corresponding air space of Huangyan Dao. Over the past 7 plus years, the Philippine side had abided by the above agreements, and fishing by Philippine fishermen in designated areas off Huangyan Dao was not an issue. However, these arrangements are unilaterally disrupted by the current Philippine administration who dispatched its coast guard ships and official vessels to intrude a number of times into waters within 12 nautical miles of Huangyan Dao and encouraged the Filipino fishermen to challenge the arrangements to help promote its political agenda. This spokesperson from PCG didn’t shy away from admitting the fact that the current Philippine administration crossed the red line in Huangyan Dao. China was compelled to take necessary measures to safeguard our sovereignty and maritime rights and interests. Aside from disrupting existing fishing arrangements in Huangyan Dao, the current Philippine administration also reneged on its own words on the management of Renai Jiao and unilaterally abandoned the Gentlemen’s Agreement, Internal Understanding and New Model agreed upon by the two sides. This is the real cause of maritime incidents that heightened tension in the South China Sea over the past year.


*Tapos pagbinomba may dalang media.
 
haha see. wag na tayo mag lokohan POGO para lang yan sa mga malaking buwaya. strategy yan nang Tsina, no need boots on the ground, economic warfare parin talaga labanan. A weak Philippines is good for Tsina.
if nabasa mo yung isa kong post, it says hindi pwede mag hire ang POGO ng pinoy kasi yung country natin mismo bans ga̾mbling, so technically not qualified ang pinoy since walang alam sa sugal, BPOs on the other hand prefer pinoy for their language proficiency, so yang 17% na pinoy most likely sa mga roles yan not related to ga̾mbling

claims lang yan ang economic warfare tulad ng US takot din sa china, naging puppet tayo ng US since kung anu mindset nila ginagaya din ng pinoy
 
Common trade routes kasi yung areas na yun kahit nakadiskubre o mga nakapagpangalan ng mga isla ay americas at spanish occupation, matagal na ding trade route ng china sa pinas too noon pa lang at may claim din ang china, maganda naman relationship ng pinas at china kahit noong unang panahon palang di tayo sinasakop pre-colonial bartering at napakalapit nila satin.

Ang ginawa lang talaga ng west ngayon pinulitika or tineritoryo (by proxy) yung route na yan tapos dinadamay pa ang pinas/ibat ibang bansa kasi mahalaga yung locasyon na yun for trading (dahil galit sila sa economic boon ng china, samahan pa ng tech sanctions). Ang mahirap dito baka gawing proxy war lang tayo.

^ pag nagkataon mababankrupt na ang pinas. Kakabili ng armas sa (West) ni isang modern fighter jet wala tayo You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. tignan mo naman sa list :( lugi lang ang pinas kung papatulan pa yan. Kahit na ibigay pa satin yang area na yan di naman natin kayang idefend, kahit mga mangingisda nga lang di na natin madefend yan pa kaya..
 
maganda naman relationship ng pinas at china kahit noong unang panahon palang di tayo sinasakop pre-colonial bartering at napakalapit nila satin.
nagka gentleman agreement na at kumalma na ang china after palayasin ang US dito sa bansa, ngayon ibinalik na naman, naging threat na ulet tayo sa kanila dahil pinapayagan natin ang US na maki-alam, hindi tayo ang kalaban ng china, ang kalaban nila ay yung mga countries na kayang makipag laban sa kanila, hangga't may US dito walang katahimikan ang WPS
 
nagka gentleman agreement na at kumalma na ang china after palayasin ang US dito sa bansa, ngayon ibinalik na naman, naging threat na din tayo sa kanila dahil pinapayagan natin ang US na maki-alam, hindi tayo ang kalaban ng china, ang kalaban nila ay yung mga countries na kayang makipag laban sa kanila, hangga't may US dito walang katahimikan ang WPS
Yun nga ang problema. Kasi pwede magstation ng drone military tech dito. Like yung nangyari sa Iran, nabulls-eye lang yung general agad agad, kung may nakastation dito na ganoong tech talagang magagalit ang China saatin. Ang stance lang talaga ng Pilipinas ay maging centrist/neutral kaya nga hindi tayo masyado nagiinvest sa mga armas armas. Ang problema lang talaga natin naging weakest link na tayo sa buong Asia (and most strategic location) so mataas ang chance na maging problema ito. Samahan pa na ang US Navy ay mostly "Philippine Navy by proxy" dami kasing pinoy doon. Pinapalala lang nila yung tension kaya lagi yan ang nasa news.

Kung ano man ang plano ng US, war or peace, depende padin sa kanila, biktima lang ang pinas kung sakali parang nung Vietnam war, it's up to them. Sa tingin ko wala naman silang mapapala dahil di naman ganoon kalakas ekonomiya ng pinas para bumili ng armas pero opportunity din nila ito para matry mga makabagong warfare and the scary part dahil weakest link ang Pilipinas dito nakasalalay kung ano ba talaga ang mangyayari.



quote-everything-depends-on-the-americans-if-they-want-to-make-war-for-20-years-then-we-shall...webp
 
Yun nga ang problema. Kasi pwede magstation ng drone military tech dito. Like yung nangyari sa Iran, nabulls-eye lang yung general agad agad, kung may nakastation dito na ganoong tech talagang magagalit ang China saatin. Ang stance lang talaga ng Pilipinas ay maging centrist/neutral kaya nga hindi tayo masyado nagiinvest sa mga armas armas. Ang problema lang talaga natin naging weakest link na tayo sa buong Asia (and most strategic location) so mataas ang chance na maging problema ito. Samahan pa na ang US Navy ay mostly "Philippine Navy by proxy" dami kasing pinoy doon. Pinapalala lang nila yung tension kaya lagi yan ang nasa news.
kaya hahanap-hanapin ko pa din ang foreign policy ni duterte na kahit kailan walang mi-isang boots ang tatapak sa bansa na galing sa kahit anong foreign country, yun pa din ang tunay na neutral, yung hindi nagpapa influence sa mindset ng any foreign country, friends to all enemy to none
 
higpitan lang yang pogo, kung puro gulo lang abutin natin jan mas magandang tangalin nalang yan, destabalized pa tayo nian.
Tandaan ko may isang cas ino rin na, ni isang pinoy na worker wala
 
if nabasa mo yung isa kong post, it says hindi pwede mag hire ang POGO ng pinoy kasi yung country natin mismo bans ga̾mbling, so technically not qualified ang pinoy since walang alam sa sugal, BPOs on the other hand prefer pinoy for their language proficiency, so yang 17% na pinoy most likely sa mga roles yan not related to ga̾mbling

claims lang yan ang economic warfare tulad ng US takot din sa china, naging puppet tayo ng US since kung anu mindset nila ginagaya din ng pinoy

wag mo na explain, kahit mali. sagot dyan is hindi talaga kumukuha nang ibang lahi Tsina kahit sa ibang sector, sa Africa ganun din all Chinese.

halatang halata ah, galeng gumawa nang palusot, mukhang pro kana dyan kagaya ni Sassot na isang freelance bayaran.
 
wag mo na explain, kahit mali. sagot dyan is hindi talaga kumukuha nang ibang lahi Tsina kahit sa ibang sector, sa Africa ganun din all Chinese.

halatang halata ah, galeng gumawa nang palusot, mukhang pro kana dyan kagaya ni Sassot na isang freelance bayaran.
mandarin ang language na alam niya, bakit siya pakukuhanin mo ng japanese?
 
if nabasa mo yung isa kong post, it says hindi pwede mag hire ang POGO ng pinoy kasi yung country natin mismo bans ga̾mbling, so technically not qualified ang pinoy since walang alam sa sugal, BPOs on the other hand prefer pinoy for their language proficiency, so yang 17% na pinoy most likely sa mga roles yan not related to ga̾mbling
It is true that Duterte bans ******** in our country but there's no law that prohibits POGO from hiring Filipinos as their employees that involves ********. In fact, You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Duterte said "You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.". He cited the impact of POGOs on livelihood as a reason for allowing them to continue operations.
 
bakit pa natin sasabihin sa pogo yan? kapag wala sa interes ng bansa natin, tinatangal o pinapalayas. simpleng simple. sila gumawa ng paraan hnd tayo, sila magnenegosyo satin. ano yan puro hamig lang?
 
bakit pa natin sasabihin sa pogo yan? kapag wala sa interes ng bansa natin, tinatangal o pinapalayas. simpleng simple. sila gumawa ng paraan hnd tayo, sila magnenegosyo satin. ano yan puro hamig lang?
never pala tayo nagka interest lumago ang economy boss?
 
alam mo plhbg1 kahit gano pa kalaki yang nacontribute ni pogo. kung makakasira na bayan o interest namin pilipino, dapat inaalis. alam mo yung outweigh the benefits?
 
alam mo plhbg1 kahit gano pa kalaki yang nacontribute ni pogo. kung makakasira na bayan o interest namin pilipino, dapat inaalis. alam mo yung outweigh the benefits?
tama yan, pero isang case lang ang may hatol bakit nilalahat, yung POGO na nahatulan yun lang ang nakakasira
 

About this Thread

  • 114
    Replies
  • 4K
    Views
  • 7
    Participants
Last reply from:
plhbg1

Trending Topics

Online now

Members online
1,131
Guests online
993
Total visitors
2,124

Forum statistics

Threads
2,273,962
Posts
28,952,706
Members
1,235,008
Latest member
kaninalangay
Back
Top