Duterte calls for rational dialogue with China

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte called for rational and friendly dialogue with China on current bilateral issues and E×ρréššed sadness over the disputes in the South China Sea and the policies adopted by the current administration toward China in a recent interview by Global Times.

When asked about the message he wanted to convey to the people of both the Philippines and China regarding the current state of China-Philippines relations, Duterte issued a warning. He cautioned that the US is attempting to instigate a war between China and the Philippines, emphasizing that the US would not risk American lives for Filipinos. Duterte E×ρréššed hope that the Philippines could steer away from its detrimental path and resolve issues through dialogue and negotiation.

He E×ρréššed hope to stop the ruckus over the South China Sea, stating that the Americans are the ones pushing the Philippine government to go out there and quarrel and eventually maybe start a war.

Duterte thinks China and the Philippines have to wait before returning to the negotiating table on the South China Sea issue. "You cannot talk to the Philippine government because it is the Americans that will tell them what he should say to you. So it's forever a cycle of incongruity," he said.

Duterte envisions China and the Philippines collaborating to enrich people-to-people exchanges. Despite many Filipinos leaning towards a pro-American stance due to the educational system, he aspires for them to embrace new perspectives.

 

[rodey_lyf]

so your saying kahit pasok sa eez natin basta may claim ang china they can just throw their weight around bullying us at wala tayong magagawa kasi may teritorial claim sila? that sounds really absurd... nanalo na nga tayo sa hagues pero dahil sabi ni duterte na basura lang daw ang desisyon balewala na ang panalo natin sa unclos ganun ba sinasabi mo? parang may pag aari kang lupa pero dahil may gustong umagaw sa lupa mo pwede silang magtayo ng straktura sa looban ng nasasakupan mo. hahaha! teritorial dispute nga ang pinaglalaban dito pero malinaw na tayo ang may ari ng nasa loob ng eez natin pero pilit nilang sinasakop para makontrol ang south east asia. wala nga namang makakapasok na ibang bansa kung kontrolado nila ang karagatan dahil strategic ang location nito. world domination ang gusto ng tsina. kung mahal mo ang pinas dapat mas pinatatanggol mo ang sariling bansa mo hindi ang nanakop at nambubully sa kapwa mo pilipino.

ganito yan kasimple paps, may mga isla talaga ang China dyan kaya may EEZ din sila dyan overlapping kung ipipilit yan EEZ na yan, pero fact is UNCLOS is not ratified by US. China ratified it but reject some of its provisions.

MARKADO na lahat ng features dyan sa SCS/WPS, lahat ng islets, atolls, shoals ay may nakasakop na(meron ng may CONTROL), wala ng maaagaw pa ang PInas, last na yung pag-asa island na naagaw natin mula sa China nuong 1971 dahil mahina pa sila nuon

 

[plhbg1]

so your saying kahit pasok sa eez natin basta may claim ang china they can just throw their weight around bullying us at wala tayong magagawa kasi may teritorial claim sila? that sounds really absurd... nanalo na nga tayo sa hagues pero dahil sabi ni duterte na basura lang daw ang desisyon balewala na ang panalo natin sa unclos ganun ba sinasabi mo? parang may pag aari kang lupa pero dahil may gustong umagaw sa lupa mo pwede silang magtayo ng straktura sa looban ng nasasakupan mo. hahaha! teritorial dispute nga ang pinaglalaban dito pero malinaw na tayo ang may ari ng nasa loob ng eez natin pero pilit nilang sinasakop para makontrol ang south east asia. wala nga namang makakapasok na ibang bansa kung kontrolado nila ang karagatan dahil strategic ang location nito. world domination ang gusto ng tsina. kung mahal mo ang pinas dapat mas pinatatanggol mo ang sariling bansa mo hindi ang nanakop at nambubully sa kapwa mo pilipino.

you must learn to separate EEZ and territorial dispute boss because EEZ is NOT territory, in terms of EEZ there is no doubt na tayo lang ang may EEZ diyan sa particular spot na yan but sad to say di gaanong kalakasang power ang EEZ as compared to a REAL territory, so in terms of territory bossing we are all claimants kaya we are asserting each others sovereignty which includes fishing

 

[darkbayklog]

ganito yan kasimple paps, may mga isla talaga ang China dyan kaya may EEZ din sila dyan overlapping kung ipipilit yan EEZ na yan, pero fact is UNCLOS is not ratified by US. China ratified it but reject some of its provisions.

MARKADO na lahat ng features dyan sa SCS/WPS, lahat ng islets, atolls, shoals ay may nakasakop na(meron ng may CONTROL), wala ng maaagaw pa ang PInas, last na yung pag-asa island na naagaw natin mula sa China nuong 1971 dahil mahina pa sila nuon

napakalayo na ng tsina sa pinipilit nilang teritoryo nila. An “exclusive economic zone,” or “EEZ” is an area of the ocean, generally extending 200 nautical miles (230 miles) beyond a nation's territorial sea, within which a coastal nation has jurisdiction over both living and nonliving resources. nagtayo lang sila ng artificial islands kay pinipilit nila ang claim nila pero napakalinaw na tayo ang mas may karapatan sa dagat w/in our teritotial waters. nagtataka lang ako bakit parang pinapaboran nyo pa yata ang tsina kaysa sa bansa nyo when it is very obvious na di maganda ginagawa nila sa bansa natin. playing victim pa sila tayonpa pinapalabas na aggressor. hahaha!

 

[plhbg1]

nagtataka lang ako bakit parang pinapaboran nyo pa yata ang tsina kaysa sa bansa nyo when it is very obvious na di maganda ginagawa nila sa bansa natin. playing victim pa sila tayonpa pinapalabas na aggressor. hahaha!

hehe you still keep hiding under EEZ, hindi nga EEZ ang hanap ng China diyan, gusto nila nine-dash line (territory) hayz nako, that particular spot is 473 nautical miles from China, minus 12 nautical miles for their territorial sea which means their EEZ would become 461 nautical miles which is wrong, EEZ is capped only at 200 nautical miles, kaya nga sabi ko sayo hindi EEZ ang hanap ng China diyan kundi territory

 

[darkbayklog]

hehe you still keep hiding under EEZ, hindi nga EEZ ang hanap ng China diyan, gusto nila nine-dash line (territory) hayz nako, that particular spot is 473 nautical miles from China, minus 12 nautical miles for their territorial sea which means their EEZ is 461 nautical miles which is wrong, EEZ is capped only at 200 nautical miles, kaya nga sabi ko sayo hindi EEZ ang hanap ng China diyan kundi territory

i am not hiding under eez, i'm just stating a fact kasi panay pasok nila sa teritorial waters ng pinas at china pa ang aggressor, binobomba tayo ng water canons at hinaharass mga fisherfolks habang sinisira nila ang karagatan. nine dash line is a Fairy tale china made to lay claims to the whofe of the South China Sea. sila lang nainiwala sa nine dash line nila. the whole world does not.
tanong ko lang paps, nacucurious kasi ako eh. pinoy ka ba? sobra yata pagdepensa mo sa chinese ah.

 

[rodey_lyf]

napakalayo na ng tsina sa pinipilit nilang teritoryo nila. An “exclusive economic zone,” or “EEZ” is an area of the ocean, generally extending 200 nautical miles (230 miles) beyond a nation's territorial sea, within which a coastal nation has jurisdiction over both living and nonliving resources. nagtayo lang sila ng artificial islands kay pinipilit nila ang claim nila pero napakalinaw na tayo ang mas may karapatan sa dagat w/in our teritotial waters. nagtataka lang ako bakit parang pinapaboran nyo pa yata ang tsina kaysa sa bansa nyo when it is very obvious na di maganda ginagawa nila sa bansa natin. playing victim pa sila tayonpa pinapalabas na aggressor. hahaha!

may isla nga sila dyan paps, dimo gets eh

 

[darkbayklog]

may isla nga sila dyan paps, dimo gets eh

saan banda paps? bukod sa mga artificial islands nila. please educate me.

 

[rodey_lyf]

saan banda paps? bukod sa mga artificial islands nila. please educate me.

may google naman paps, like mo ba spoon feeding parang baby? meron dyan sa spratly islands ay isla ng china including taiwan, vietnam, malaysia at brunei

wag kasi uto uto sa propaganda ng US, di nga ratified ng US ang UNCLOS paano nila maenforce, haha, patawa, basahin mo din kasi UNCLOS para maliwanagan ka, China did not fully ratified UNCLOS fyi lang kasi di mo alam eh

 

[plhbg1]

i am not hiding under eez, i'm just stating a fact kasi panay pasok nila sa teritorial waters ng pinas at china pa ang aggressor, binobomba tayo ng water canons at hinaharass mga fisherfolks habang sinisira nila ang karagatan. nine dash line is a Fairy tale china made to lay claims to the whofe of the South China Sea. sila lang nainiwala sa nine dash line nila. the whole world does not.
tanong ko lang paps, nacucurious kasi ako eh. pinoy ka ba? sobra yata pagdepensa mo sa chinese ah.

yup we also claim the area in terms of territory hehe kaya nga tinawag na disputed areas diba, anu ba expect mo sa disputed areas boss? expect ka na si Philippines lang ang mapayapang makikinabang diyan?

 

[darkbayklog]

yup we also claim the area in terms of territory hehe kaya nga tinawag na disputed areas diba, anu ba expect mo sa disputed areas boss? expect ka na si Philippines lang ang mapayapang makikinabang diyan?

sabi ko na nga ba intsik ka eh.... hahaha!

 

[plhbg1]

sabi ko na nga ba intsik ka eh.... hahaha!

ehehe there is no need na maging Chinese to deliver a solid argument bossing, wala sa race yan, nasa utak yan

 

[darkbayklog]

ehehe there is no need na maging Chinese to deliver a solid argument bossing, wala sa race yan, nasa utak yan

wala sa race? hahaha! utak ba? di need ng utak yan. obvious naman china is the one doing the bullying tapos sasabihin pilipinas panang gumagawa ng aggression. playing the victim card. hahaha!

 

[mutagenesisx]

sabi ko na nga ba intsik ka eh.... hahaha!

or nagtratrabaho sa isang intsek. maybe sa cebu.

 

[plhbg1]

wala sa race? hahaha! utak ba? di need ng utak yan. obvious naman china is the one doing the bullying tapos sasabihin pilipinas panang gumagawa ng aggression. playing the victim card. hahaha!

so nasa race pala ang pag deliver ng argument? kahit walang utak basta chinese?