di naman na-criminalized yung wrong usage of pronouns boss, it the refusal to use correct pronouns that constitutes a harassmentFirst the word is "irrational"
Second it is the demand to criminalize wrong usage of pronouns that is irrational.
di naman na-criminalized yung wrong usage of pronouns boss, it the refusal to use correct pronouns that constitutes a harassmentFirst the word is "irrational"
Second it is the demand to criminalize wrong usage of pronouns that is irrational.
Would you sue me if I call you in the wrong pronoun? Personally you can call me whatever you want pero in no case I would think of you as a criminal.di naman na-criminalized yung wrong usage of pronouns boss, it the refusal to use correct pronouns that constitutes a harassment
if merong refusal factor boss, if intention mo talaga to use the wrong pronounWould you sue me if I call you in the wrong pronoun?
Refusal of language use as a crime is questionable. Example:if merong refusal factor boss, if intention mo talaga to use the wrong pronoun
yeah if i refuse to stop saying atheistic stuff to someone that could be a harassment especially if the person already told they don't want to hear it, gusto ko nga din ipakulong yung mga christians eh kasi di ko alam papaano sila patigilin sa pag preach ng gospel to meRefusal of language use as a crime is questionable. Example:
What if a christian wants you to go to jail because you refuse to stop saying atheistic stuff, it follows the same logic, but do you see this as rational?
Layo nmn ng inabot ng explanation mo doon lng sa salitang "may be". Ginamit ko lng nmn yan term na yan dahil there is no humane way to dissect an autistic person and an lgbt person just to confirm this. And yes this are all theories based on observing their outside behavior.
If you are a true non-conformist, you should be open to the possibility na tama ang mentioned theory, despite your prejudice against autism and you should be ready to accept the idea that all of as "may be" autistics to some extent.
But I would like you to focus more to the idea that if lgbtq+ is a symptom of autism - if this is ever proven to be true - should we grant the autistics including the lgbtq community the same control over our culture? To what extent do we tolerate behaviors that are a produced by autism? To what extent do we try to divert their wants... specially if it involves major body alteration?
Di nga. Ang ipinagkaiba lang kase ay ang mga LGBTQ+ ay mga monogamous pagdating sa love and relationship pagkatapos meron kasal sa simbahan and they believe in a Christian God then some of them ay meron mga threesome pa iyan pagdating sa seks although hindi ko naman inilalahat ha na ganoon ang mga tao na nasa LGBTQ+ versus sa Pagan culture na ang meron sa kanila ay polyamorous pagkatapos meron silang God(s) and Goddess(es). Iyon nga lang na meron itinatawag na reverse sexism. Hirap daw kase ang mga straight doon but hindi sila gumagawa-gawa ng group na katulad sa atin na meron mga LGBTQ , feminism , woke or whatever pa diyan group , walang ganun.yeah if i refuse to stop saying atheistic stuff to someone that could be a harassment especially if the person already told they don't want to hear it, gusto ko nga din ipakulong yung mga christians eh kasi di ko alam papaano sila patigilin sa pag preach ng gospel to me