PHah nabasa mo lang pala akala ko galing ka na sa impyerno at na-promote papuntang langit
you just realize and it is enough to stop science from existing? can science consider realization as proof? i don't think so
-
Welcome to PHCorner Forums! Sign up for free to unlock full access and exclusive privileges, including:
- Asking questions about computer and mobile issues
- Discovering internet tips for your mobile network and computer
🔒 Closed Is Death a Part of Life? should we embrace if like we do when someone is being born?
- Status
Kaplok Kaplok
Forum Guru
Sino nagsabi "stop science from existing"? At "realization as proof"? Wala nmn akong sinasabi ganyan.
implied rather than said, you said it can be no (implies you are stopping science to exist), you said it can be no because we realized (ginamit mo pa ang realization as proof for science to stop existing)
Kaplok Kaplok
Forum Guru
Implied? Or assumed?
i assumed that you implied, if the assumption not correct then you will have to explain
Kaplok Kaplok
Forum Guru
Look what i found
But that is not the point.
Explain ko.. diba
- "necessity is the mother of invention"
-we currently chase immortality, due to it's percieved necessity
IF in case realize that there is no necessity to immortality
THEREFORE we then stop the attempt to chase it
Conclusion is, there is POSSIBILITY that science will stop to "solve death"
so you are saying that we will know that immortality is non-sense before we experience it?
Kaplok Kaplok
Forum Guru
Not exactly.
What i am saying is:
The statement
"science will continue to find immortality forever, or until it finds it"
Is not absolute.
To say it, It is really a product of faith in science, and naive outlook in life. Searching a solution for death might just be another false hope no different from searching for a fictional paradise called heaven.
Both belief has the tendency to make us not live life to the fullest.
faith in science? is it possible to have faith on something already existing?
the only situation that that statement is not absolute is when we find out that immortality is non-sense before we find immortality itself which is crazy hehe
Kaplok Kaplok
Forum Guru
Your faith in science finding immortality is already crazy. Ang lagay ba ikaw lang pwede magkaron ng crazy idea? Hahaha
ahaha edi stop tayo gamit ng crazy, tatanungin na lang kita, is it possible to prove that something is worthless before we discover that something?
Kaplok Kaplok
Forum Guru
Yes
The worth of anything does not lie on the thing. It lies on how it is needed by the seeker.
Baguhin natin yung tanong para naman sayo, would you continue searching for something once you decided you dont need it?
before ko iyan sagutin meron ako follow-up question, how would you prove something is worthless before the discovery of that something?
Kaplok Kaplok
Forum Guru
Worth cannot be proven or measured. 1000 pesos worth of food has more worth than 1M pesos cash once cash is not accepted. Things worth relies on your percieved need for it.
ayun naman pala, perception pala ang keyword, ok na sana yung realize naging perception pa hehe
Kaplok Kaplok
Forum Guru
Have you ever found God, for you to decide he was worthless?
god is not worthless yet or else naging atheist na ako, kaya nga atheist is religion pa din, based on perception of things as opposed to science
Kaplok Kaplok
Forum Guru
Agnosticsm is really a deceptive and confused position.
Be honest. Are you, (or any agnostic) even actively searching for God or find any worth doing so?
And give me an example of anything (even in science) that is not based on the human perception. Everything is just really something processed by our perception.
- Status