🕯️ Traditions Starve Them With Silence

[SerasV]

 

[Min3]

Ate serasv welcome backkkako to si sacrifice hehe di ko alam if naaalala mo pa ako ate

 

[plhbg1]

i would say misunderstanding cannot be intentional kasi it will take you to understand something first before intentionally denying understanding of something, and also those who are going against us are not just a misunderstanding but they understand instead kaya nga nag disagree, all you need to do is defend and prove them wrong instead of hiding in silent defense

 

[SerasV]

i would say misunderstanding cannot be intentional kasi it will take you to understand something first before intentionally denying understanding of something, and also those who are going against us are not just a misunderstanding but they understand instead kaya nga nag disagree, all you need to do is defend and prove them wrong instead of hiding in silent defense

Nice opinion!

Ate serasv welcome backkkako to si sacrifice hehe di ko alam if naaalala mo pa ako ate

Oo naalala pa kita syempre. Napadaan lang ako.

 

[NOUGHT]

all you need to do is defend and prove them wrong instead of hiding in silent defense

at yung process niyan minsan ay komplikado dahil minsan mas lalong hindi ka maiintindihan minsan din mas dadami pa yung tao na maiinis sayo kaya minsan din ang katahimikan din ang sagot

 

[plhbg1]

at yung process niyan minsan ay komplikado dahil minsan mas lalong hindi ka maiintindihan minsan din mas dadami pa yung tao na maiinis sayo kaya minsan din ang katahimikan din ang sagot

that if yung pakay mo is i-enforce ang idea mo at need mo ang kanilang understanding to make it come true

pero if yung intention is to prove wrong regardless of tatanggapin ba ng madla o hindi then you can always let them know that you disagree, mostly kasi ang nanahimik is not intentional kundi wala na lang talaga masabi

 

[NOUGHT]

that if yung pakay mo is i-enforce ang idea mo at need mo ang kanilang understanding to make it come true

pero if yung intention is to prove wrong regardless of tatanggapin ba ng madla o hindi then you can always let them know that you disagree, mostly kasi ang nanahimik is not intentional kundi wala na lang talaga masabi

theoretical po ba yan o reality?
kasi po nangyari na yung sinasabi ko
the more na ipaliwanag mo the more na hindi ka pakikinggan though wala ka naman ginawa pero hindi ka pinagkakatiwalaan sa paliwanag mo kaya ang resulta
ang state ng pag iisip nuong kinausap mo sarado at ang sinasabi niya sa isip niya "wag ka na magpalusot kilala na kita" lahat ng paliwanag mo naging palusot lang sa kanya at dahil sa "marites" na yan na chismis ka at nasira ka mas pinaniwalaan pa nila yung chismis kaysa dun sa mang gagaling sa bibig mo

ganyan din naman ang christianity

 

[plhbg1]

theoretical po ba yan o reality?
kasi po nangyari na yung sinasabi ko
the more na ipaliwanag mo the more na hindi ka pakikinggan though wala ka naman ginawa pero hindi ka pinagkakatiwalaan sa paliwanag mo kaya ang resulta
ang state ng pag iisip nuong kinausap mo sarado at ang sinasabi niya sa isip niya "wag ka na magpalusot kilala na kita" lahat ng paliwanag mo naging palusot lang sa kanya at dahil sa "marites" na yan na chismis ka at nasira ka mas pinaniwalaan pa nila yung chismis kaysa dun sa mang gagaling sa bibig mo

totoo lahat ang sinasabi mo boss but it will only bother you if your intention is to enforce your idea kumbaga hindi lahat ng nag sasalita ay meron same intention sayo kaya iba din nangyayari sa kanila especially when you don't need supporters, ang intention mo lang talaga is to let them know your stand

ganyan din naman ang christianity

nah very good example ang topic na iyan because christianity aims to evangelize the world, not enough sa kanila yung let them know lang but they consider conversion as the fruits of their labor