🔒 Closed Tension in china and taiwan

visit my last thread for in news and current events para sa link ng telegram

 

[Away From Keyboard]

bebentahan ata nila nang armas pang depensa ang TW, France ang pinaka agresibo sa pag benta nang mga kagamitan pang depensa/

 

[rodey_lyf]

kahit na magsamasama sila us/nato, di sila mananalo sa china, madami lang madadamay na civilians sa ginagawa nila

 

[Dreath29]

kahit na magsamasama sila us/nato, di sila mananalo sa china, madami lang madadamay na civilians sa ginagawa nila

hehehe, kahit NATO lang kaya nyang patumbahin ang China, pero Yung NATO kasi is an Alliance and so they will consider the pro's and con's.

but anyway India ngayon napansin Kong anlakas nang army, bale Kaya nyang pantayan yung China interms of military.

 

[Kage22]

kahit na magsamasama sila us/nato, di sila mananalo sa china, madami lang madadamay na civilians sa ginagawa nila

Thermo-nuclear warfare? Walang mananalo pero kung conventional warfare, walang chance ang China against NATO. US alone could easily defeat China in conventional warfare. Di hamak mas malaki ang annual defense budget ng US compare sa China and active lage ang US sa digmaan sa nakaraang dekada while China's last involvement in war was the Korean war and the Vietnam war. Ano nalang kung NATO pa.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Thermo-nuclear warfare? Walang mananalo pero kung conventional warfare, walang chance ang China against NATO. US alone could easily defeat China in conventional warfare. Di hamak mas malaki ang annual defense budget ng US compare sa China and active lage ang US sa digmaan sa nakaraang dekada while China's last involvement in war was the Korean war and the Vietnam war. Ano nalang kung NATO pa.

just look at Afghanistan, US/Nato conventional warfare

 

[Kage22]

just look at Afghanistan, US/Nato conventional warfare

Nagpapatawa ka ba?

President Barack Obama wanted to withdraw its forces from Afghanistan, but the debate that ensued about Osama bin Laden – the main suspect – still at large forced the US administration to maintain its footprint on the ground and hunt down bin Laden. The US finally succeeded in killing him on May 2, 2011. Since then, the withdrawal of USA troops from Afghanistan was a foregone conclusion.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Ayan basahin mo di yun gagawa gawa ka ng sarili mong kwento Lol.

Walang makakatalo sa NATO kapag conventional warfare ang labanan dahil sa mga innovative gears and weapons and their effective strategies in modern warfare. Walang sinabi yan mga idolo nyo sa NATO.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Nagpapatawa ka ba?



You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Ayan basahin mo di yun gagawa gawa ka ng sarili mong kwento Lol.

di ako nagbabasa ng propaganda nila, all i know is 20 years sila dun, and they did not win, I'm a result oriented person

anyway let us just wait regarding sa China, you can choose US/Nato all you want, but the result will be the judge

 

[Kage22]

di ako nagbabasa ng propaganda nila, all i know is 20 years sila dun, and they did not win, I'm a result oriented person

anyway let us just wait regarding sa China, you can choose US/Nato all you want, but the result will be the judge

They successfully removed Bin Laden back then. Anong panalo pala ang gusto nyo? Remember we are talking about military might between US/NATO and China. Kahit saang angle mo pa titingnan, walang chance ang China na manalo against NATO alliance. Libre lang naman mangarap.

 

[rodey_lyf]

They successfully removed Bin Laden back then. Anong panalo pala ang gusto nyo? Remember we are talking about military might between US/NATO and China. Kahit saang angle mo pa titingnan, walang chance ang China na manalo against NATO alliance. Libre lang naman mangarap.

don't judge the book by its cover, anyway the Taliban won in Afghanistan

 

[Kage22]

don't judge the book by its cover, anyway the Taliban won in Afghanistan

Only because US pulled out their troops. In the event of conflict, a conventional warfare, China won't stand a chance against NATO, even the US alone.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Only because US pulled out their troops. In the event of conflict, a conventional warfare, China won't stand a chance against NATO, even the US alone.

they pulled out because they can not win, as simple as that.

anyway China will not fight a war with US unless US attack first, if that happen, the day of judgment will come to US fast and hard

 

[Moshiemochi]

Source: tg??

 

[Kage22]

they pulled out because they can not win, as simple as that.

They pulled off their troops because they do not want to spend more money in maintaining their occupatation in Afghan anymore without gaining much in return.

anyway China will not fight a war with US unless US attack first, if that happen, the day of judgment will come to US fast and hard

China could not beat US in conventional warfare. Not a chance. China was not active in major conflict for many decades. There's no need to argue for it. Majority knows what country have the superior military power.

 

[Dreath29]

They pulled off their troops because they do not want to spend more money in maintaining their occupatation in Afghan anymore without gaining much in return.


China could not beat US in conventional warfare. Not a chance. China was not active in major conflict for many decades. There's no need to argue for it. Majority knows what country have the superior military power.

but for real, China is real powerful in terms of economics.

 

[Kage22]

but for real, China is real powerful in terms of economics.

But in the event of war, their economy could be frozen by blockading their trade routes and only a matter of time before China will be suffocated by shared power of NATO or by its own people under economic sanctions.

 

[Dreath29]

But in the event of war, their economy could be frozen by blockading their trade routes and only a matter of time before China will be suffocated by shared power of NATO or by the its own people under economic sanctions.

China new invention, which is 7 nm I think is a super chips mostly surpassing the chips from Taiwan and other cause it's a smaller type of chips.

so i think for China there is almost no sense in acquiring Taiwan pwera lang sa factors like chips production which can be updated to this new invention of China.

 

[Kage22]

China new invention, which is 7 nm I think is a super chips mostly surpassing the chips from Taiwan and other cause it's a smaller type of chips.

so i think for China there is almost no sense in acquiring Taiwan pwera lang sa factors like chips production which can be updated to this new invention of China.

Taiwan already made 5nm chips and is planning to make 3nm chips.

Aside from producing chips, Taiwan is a strategic location militarily that's why China was trying so hard to unify Taiwan through intimidation for over a decade without a success.

 

[onnhel6]

anuman mangyari, quiet lang tayo dyan. gitna lang tayo, wag na umepal yung iba na tapang tapangan palibahasa may tataguan na magandang mansiyon at maraming paraan para tumakas

 

[Kage22]

anuman mangyari, quiet lang tayo dyan. gitna lang tayo, wag na umepal yung iba na tapang tapangan palibahasa may tataguan na magandang mansiyon at maraming paraan para tumakas

Napag-usapan lang dahil kahit hindi kasali ang bansa natin sa magiging digmaan nila, maaapektuhan parin tayo through economy.