so you are saying all societies not founded on christianity have different rules in their constitution?
there are already lots of unknown answered as of today, what you want is a swift answer to all unknowns in which the bible is the answer key, swift answer, all unknowns being thrown to a "God did it" basket hehe
Lol kulang ang na e quote mong verse from the Bible about sa Pera, mali pati ang pag pagkaunawa mo sa verse nayan
nilagay din ba doon sa bible ang rason bakit hindi siya tinanggap?
Yes ,,if may Bible ka mababasa mo rin,,"men love darkness" yan ang dahilan kaya di sya tinanggap.
Which GOD do you believe in?I know that a lot of people who do not believe in Christianity find the idea of love your neighbors, enemies, and those who do injustices to you as how you love yourselves is bizarre and insane. Honestly, I am not sure if I can love, or even forgive the perpetrator if something unfortunate as that happened to me. I understand that it is a serious concern. But, thank god we have a state which is responsible for making judgement in my behalf to your hypothetical event. Though, I do not think it is hypocritical to seek justice in a secular way if you are a theist. It is the responsibility of the sovereign state to protect and provide a just and humane way of living for its constituents. Our constitution, fortunate enough, is founded on the idea that we are under God. Let us not give too much credit to non-theists like they are the greater people when the law they implement to thrive in this society is founded on the idea of individual divinity. Practicality may seem be more attractive to you, but it does not always work in many complex situations.
I do not get exactly what you want to say here but I say misuse of money is bad. Money sustains our material needs. If a person with good conscience has enough money, there is a fair chance he/she would thrive, which is good. There are some who live with less material possessions but that may just be their preference, or likely economic issues.
Yes, this is most likely the reason why there is a strong rejection of the biblical God who imposes human restrictions which limits their proclivity to live the way they see fit.
If your basis of objectivity to atheism is because it does not rely on any theistic ideology, then it is fair to say that theism is objective if it does not rely on atheistic ideology. I agree that the idea of personal God in some Christian doctrines are subjective, however it is different when you are talking about a revelation supported by scriptures with historical evidences. Whether you believe if it is true or not, it does not matter. It only indicates that there is an objective basis why Christians believe that God exists. On the other hand, atheists have not provided any objective basis of why God does not exist other than the untestable hypothesis that everything is created by some random evolutionary process by which it does not require certain intelligent design. But when you question the almost incalculable precision of how the material reality become what it is today, it does not make any sense logically how it just existed randomly out of nowhere. If I have to make sense of it then I have to recall the concept of magic in my childhood fairy tales. It now begs the question of which belief system is based on blind faith.
You just affirmed my view on atheism that its morality is subjective. I appreciate it.
I do not know the show you are talking about, but the thought I laid out is how naturalists view the world. You can say poetic and lovable things about our physical connections to the cosmos but it does not change the fact that I am as meaningless and insignificant as a rock to the vastness of the material universe.
so darkness lang sinabi dun? hindi yung specific reason?
sige ipapaliwanag ko sayo isa isa,,kahit na hindi ako masyado or fully theistic,,base sa pagbabasa ko ng bible ang ipapaliwanag ko sayo,,"darkness"
so nilahat lang talaga sa bible, evil deeds lang andun, and paninigarilyo is just a basic deed (auto-bad), akala ko alam ng sumulat ng bible ang specific reasons why non-theists rejects god
dyan naman papasok ang word na conscience or konsensya,,pwede rin budhi,tayo mismo alam na natin agad bilang tao yun nakabubuti at makakasama sa atin,,or yung mabuti at masama,,tayo narin yung may kontrol sa sarili naten kung ano ang gusto nateng gawin sa atin mga sarili,,sa ngayon iisa palang ang nakikita naten at napatunayan ,,na may kahatulan sa mga taong gumawa ng masama na di naaayon sa batas na ginawa ng tao ( " Government Law" )mas matindi panga kung tutuusin kaysa sa batas ng Diyos ng mga kristiyano..
Hayaan mo siya manigarilyo paps
karamihan sa mga athiest ay gusto Lang mag bisyo at sirain ang katawan pati utak kaya karamihan sa kanila ni rereject yong mga tinuturo sa Bible na mga pagbawal sa mga bisyo na nakakasira ng katawan at isip gusto lang nila mag hithit ng usok at sirain ang bagahehe sinagot ko lang yung about sa specific na tinanong nya po..Hayaan mo siya manigarilyo paps
pag sinabi ko bang ang reason ng pag reject ko sa bible is ayoko sambahin ang diyos na murderer, rapist, terrorist, homophobic mali ba iyon? uusigin ba ako ng konsensiya ko? or di ata ako napasama sa nalagyan ng conscience hehe
Lol ang panonood ng bold ay nagdudulot ng kalibugan at masamang pagnanasa sa babae/lalake hindi man word for word na "BOLD / PRON" makikita mo yong idea na itinuturo
how did you know i'm smo̾king? naku dumadami na talaga magician dito
Bakit ikaw lang ba ang athiest sa forum na ito at nakakabasa ng mga post?
how on earth "siya" which is third person singular pronoun refers to athiests?
PH