🔒 Closed BRICS EXPANDING: TURKEY, SAUDI ARABIA, AND EGYPT WILLING TO JOIN THE GROUP

Status
Not open for further replies.

0_1658047989425_watermark_Sun_17072022_171400.webp

Purnima Anand, president of the BRICS international forum, said on July 14 that Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt are considering joining BRICS. The possibility of countries joining, as well as their potential admission to the ranks of the BRICS, could take place in 2023 when the next summit of the group will be held. The countries themselves have E×ρréššed a desire to join the union, but if approved, the application process will be lengthy.

South Africa will host the next summit in 2023, where the member countries will make the final decision.

In addition to the aforementioned countries, Iran and Argentina want to join the group. They have already submitted their applications.

On June 1-2, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov visited Riyadh, where he met with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The Saudi prince E×ρréššed his serious intention to join the BRICS.

From June 23-24, Russia, China and India discussed the issue in an online format. The talks took place on the sidelines of the 14th summit of the BRICS leaders which was also attended by 13 observer countries. Just after the summit, Argentina and Iran applied to the group. Argentina said that together the organization represents 42% of the world’s population and 24% of GDP, while Iran E×ρréššed the position that the new members would only bring mutual benefits.

With the accession of new members, the total GDP of the countries will amount to more than $ 27 trillion, which is currently the sum of the GDP of only four members.

The accession process will be heterogeneous, some countries will join a little faster than others, for example, Turkey is the closest to joining BRICS, although at the moment the Turks are experiencing serious economic difficulties.

There are no criteria for accession, so the timing of the accession of new members is unclear.

The main criteria is the country’s leadership in the region and in its integration group, but the formats of leadership are not defined, we can only assume that these are political and economic factors. According to the preferable scenario, the BRICS plans are to include every leader country from each region.

Purnima Anand commented on the expansion of the BRICS: “There is a chance that the union can work to create a new world order: increase resource sharing, develop air, trade and financial routes for the new global realities.”
Russia noted that it wants to see all the countries that have applied for membership in the organization. Russia sees the potential of new member countries. Turkey is an active player on the world stage, while Egypt founded the New Development Bank. Moreover, Turkey wanted to join the BRICS back in 2018, but then the countries found only the BRICS+ format acceptable, although now they have a more flexible approach to the issue.
 
eto bumubuhay sa russia ngayon and if the world sees NATO is weak hmm alamz na mangyayari sa BRICS
 
matagal na ugnayan na yan, ngayun binibigyan lang nang malisya ngayun. madami mga bandwagoners na bibigyan nang malisya ang pag sali nang Saudi.. it's just a summit.

ASEAN and Tsina also conduct talks/summit, but we all know most of ASEAN countries hate Tsina.
 
The US won't allow that to happen. If there's any stable currency to replace US dollar in the future it would be Euro as this currency is used in most Western EU countries and second most traded currency in the world. At this moment I don't see Yuan, Rubble or any other currency replacing US dollars or Euro as the most accepted money anywhere in the world without having to constantly go to money exchange exchange centers.

NATO vs Russia lang iyan kasi nga weak si NATO
aalagaan lang ni BRICS si Russia para tumaba at nang maka items nang husto against NATO
Military strength wise, yes BRICS is way stronger. Imagine they got Russia, China, and India in the team already which are among the countries with the most strongest militaries in the world. In terms of economy however, I don't think they are on par with NATO. China can compete against The US terms of wealth but how about the other members of BRICS? Also, we're not including here the non NATO members that are on NATOs side that are also economically wealthy countries.
 
If there's any stable currency to replace US dollar in the future it would be Euro as this currency is used in most Western EU countries and second most traded currency in the world.
Any other fiat money (Euro) cannot shut down the glory of USD.
Best way is to shutdown the fiat concept altogether and bring back the gold/silver based concept of currency.
 
BRICS is more like a G7
Economic alliance
The closer to Nato is SCO with is new member iran and belarus but its only security alliance
Let see if the EAST could create an alliance like a NATO to counter the WEST
Since russia is turning away and cutting its tie to the west

Buhay nnman kasi ung pag ka russophobia ng west😂

Nsa habit na talaga nila since napoloen war ww1, ww2
Hnd na natuto
 
The US won't allow that to happen. If there's any stable currency to replace US dollar in the future it would be Euro as this currency is used in most Western EU countries and second most traded currency in the world. At this moment I don't see Yuan, Rubble or any other currency replacing US dollars or Euro as the most accepted money anywhere in the world without having to constantly go to money exchange exchange centers.

the new currency to replace USD is not yet born, it would take years but the process already started,
definitely its not Euro as its now on a free fall, i got the feeling that EU will be disbanded and it started with UK brexit
 
Any other fiat money (Euro) cannot shut down the glory of USD.
Best way is to shutdown the fiat concept altogether and bring back the gold/silver based concept of currency.
For now dollar cannot be replaced any time soon as the US still remains the biggest economy in the world, which means many countries want USD if they wanted to make business with the US and the free world markets which the US have closed ties with. Hard to explain in words but I'm sure you're getting the idea why USD is the most traded currency, hence it's harder to replace and would probably take some time to do so. When that happens, probably the world would opt to using EURO as an alternative currency. Why? Euro is second most traded currency and most EU countries use this currency.

Regarding your suggestion to stop using fiat currency and be replaced with gold or silver- that's the dumbest idea I've ever heard. Not meant to ridicule you or something, it's just the idea is stupid. You got any idea how huge the population is today? Imagine you shop for something in the mall and you had to always carry a bag of gold with you to use it as mode of payment for something you buy? You got any clue how heavy gold is? Also, people would need to mine more gold and silver to keep the global demand. That would destroy Earth in faster rate than what experts had already predicted.
 
Imagine you shop for something in the mall and you had to always carry a bag of gold with you to use it as mode of payment for something you buy?
hehe kaya pala dumbest kasi literally gold at silver talaga, ok lang iyan kasi iba interpretation mo, this is what i mean: gold/silver backed currencies is the currency that was replaced by fiat currency after US dominated world wars

i only suggested na ibalik ang mga ito at dissolve ulit ang fiat currency
 

What are the Advantages of the Gold Standard?​

The gold standard prevents inflation as governments and banks are unable to manipulate the money supply (e.g., overissuing money). The gold standard also stabilizes prices and foreign exchange rates.

What are the Disadvantages of the Gold Standard?​

Under the gold standard, the supply of gold cannot keep pace with its demand, and it is not flexible under trying economic times. Also, mining gold is costly and creates negative environmental externalities.
 

What are the Advantages of the Gold Standard?​

The gold standard prevents inflation as governments and banks are unable to manipulate the money supply (e.g., overissuing money). The gold standard also stabilizes prices and foreign exchange rates.

What are the Disadvantages of the Gold Standard?​

Under the gold standard, the supply of gold cannot keep pace with its demand, and it is not flexible under trying economic times. Also, mining gold is costly and creates negative environmental externalities.
of course if i'm a politician why would i let gold control the amount of money in circulation instead of myself?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About this Thread

  • 18
    Replies
  • 820
    Views
  • 9
    Participants
Last reply from:
Graphmaster

New Topics

Online now

Members online
839
Guests online
913
Total visitors
1,752

Forum statistics

Threads
2,276,095
Posts
28,967,564
Members
1,231,118
Latest member
czardinas
Back
Top