PANGULONG DUTERTE, NAGBABALA SA POSIBLENG INVASION NG CHINA

Nagbabala sa publiko si Pangulong Rodrigo Duterte sa posibleng “invasion” ng China sakaling gumamit ng nuclear weapons ang Russia para pabagsakin ang Ukraine.

Ayon kay Pangulong Duterte, kapag nagpasya si Russian President Vladimir Putin na gumamit ng nasabing armas laban sa Ukraine ay maaring madamay ang Pilipinas.

Sinabi ng Pangulo na maaring pindutin ni Putin ang pulang button sa pagpapasabog ng nuclear bomb na mag-uudyok naman sa China para maglunsad din ng long range bomb mula sa South China Sea.

Matatandaang noong May 2017 nang magpunta sa Pilipinas si Russian President Vladimir Putin para tiyakin kay Pangulong Duterte na kakausapin ang China hinggil sa militarisasyon at agresyon sa South China Sea na sakop ng Exclusive Economic Zone ng Pilipinas pero hindi ito nagtagumpay dahil hindi kailanman nakikinig ang China sa payo ng sinumang bansa.

Sa ngayon, inatasan na ni Pangulong Duterte ang mga militar na payagan ang Amerika na makapunta ng Pilipinas ng walang limitasyon para masiguro ang seguridad sa bansa.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Away From Keyboard]

possible scenario lang naman, pero highly unlikely mangyari. ganun talaga ang kapalaran natin na mga bansa malapit sa Tsina.

Sa tingin ko kung magkakaroon man nang World war 3 uunahin nang Tsina ang Vietnam South Koreaa at Japan, my oras pa ang mga pinoy na mag aral nang salitang intsek. Not unless kung meron presence nang US forces dito kagaya nang mga nuclear subs at strategic bombers, edi paktay tayo.

 

[Saturn]

Malabo pa siguro Yan. So Putin na rin nagsabi na kapag nagsimula ang nuclear, katapusan na ng mundo

 

[Mari Chou]

Luh. Di pa rin ba tapos yan ? Kala ko ceasefire na

 

[dee-u]

Strategic kasi ang location natin kaya sigurado madadamay talaga tayo. Pero hopefully hindi naman sana umabot sa ganun ang sitwasyon.

 

[Deepa]

mangyayari lng yan kung may base at americano soldier sa pinas delikado ang pinas bomba ang gagawin di invasion tandaan niyo ganyan ginawa ng japan inatake ang base ng americano sa pinas kaya kung wlang base ang americano sa pinas at di gagamitin ang mga lugar para lagyan ng base walng invasion mangyayari saka bakit pa mag invade kung gagamitin ang nuclear mangdudurug lng pinas at agiging pulpus di uso ang invade ngayon durugan na ngaun ng mga building reasources

 

[sunnybear]

Kung pupunta ang mga Amerikano, anong gagawin nila sa nuclear ng China, sasaluhin?

Siguro magsimula nang mag nuclear bunker ang mga pinoy. Yung may DIY tutorials para kahit masa kayang gawin.

 

[MackriderX]

Bote nlang may dragon balls ako..

 

[Mari Chou]

Bote nlang may dragon balls ako..

Oo yung dragon balls mo gagamitin natin

 

[NOUGHT]

Russia claims it destroyed a Ukrainian ammunitions depot with hypersonic missiles capable of flying five to 25 times the speed of sound.

If confirmed, it would mark a dramatic escalation of Russia's brutal campaign to crush the pro-Western government in Kyiv and drag the country back into Moscow’s orbit.

But so far, U.S. officials and military experts say, what Russia has unleashed appears to be hypersonic hype about a potentially devastating weapon.

“It’s a bit of a head-scratcher to be honest with you,” a Pentagon official told NBC News on Monday. “If it’s true, why would you need a hypersonic missile fired from not that far away to hit a building?”

Military experts said the only reason Russian President Vladimir Putin would resort to using this kind of weaponry against the outgunned Ukrainians at this point would be to score propaganda points.

“Russia doesn’t have many of them and, frankly, doesn’t need to use them in this conflict,” said Mark Cancian of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “They’re very, very fast and designed to evade missile defenses.”

If Russia did fire such a weapon, it would be more for propaganda value to let Ukraine and the rest of the world know "they’ve got them and will use them,” he said.

President Joe Biden said late Monday that Russia had "launched their hypersonic missile because it’s the only thing that they can get through with absolute certainty." He described it as a "consequential weapon," but added that "with the same warhead on it as as any other launch missile, it doesn’t make that much difference except it’s almost impossible to stop it."

"There’s a reason for using it,” Biden added.

Earlier, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin refused to “confirm or dispute” Moscow’s assertion that it destroyed an underground warehouse in the western Ivano-Frankivsk region of Ukraine with hypersonic missiles called Kinzhals.

“I would not see it as a game changer,” the Pentagon chief said of the hypersonic missiles Sunday on CBS’ "Face the Nation."

“I think the reason (Putin) is resorting to using these types of weapons is because he is trying to re-establish some momentum,” Austin said. “And again, we’ve seen him attack towns and cities and civilians outright (and) we expect that to continue.”

U.S. officials agreed, saying Russia’s use of hypersonic missiles would be viewed as a show of strength by Moscow, but wouldn’t fundamentally change the dynamics of the three-week-old war that began with an invasion by Russian forces and is reaching a bloody stalemate.

The Russians, they said, have more than enough traditional rockets, missiles and other weapons to continue decimating Ukraine’s defenses and cities.

The United States has been working to develop hypersonic missiles since the 2000s, but it continues to lag behind China and Russia.

The next-generation weapons are extra hard to shoot down because of their maneuverability, Cancian said.

Intercontinental ballistic missiles fly much faster, but they travel in a predictable path, making it possible to intercept them before they strike any targets.

But existing U.S. missile defense systems, including the Navy’s Aegis system, would have trouble intercepting hypersonic missiles, the experts said.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[plhbg1]

si US ang trigger ni putin kaya di nya magagamit nukes niya kasi behave lang naman si US at NATO,

ok lang may presence ng US dito basta walang military alliance like NATO

 

[NOUGHT]

"Impossible to intercept": This is Russia's new deadly weapon
US officials confirm that Russia is the first country to use hypersonic missiles ever in combat.


kung totoo man na meron hypersonic missile ang russia sa estado ng pag iisip ni putin patay tayong lahat sino makakapigil jan sabihin mo ng nukes nung palaman ng hypersonic missile

wala na yung normal na buhay natin mag tatapos na
hindi nakakatuwa walang nakakatuwa

 

[Dawgz]

If ever mangyari yan walang panalo kundi history repeat its self and worst my god bless our country

 

[Away From Keyboard]

View attachment 1868038

Russia claims it destroyed a Ukrainian ammunitions depot with hypersonic missiles capable of flying five to 25 times the speed of sound.

If confirmed, it would mark a dramatic escalation of Russia's brutal campaign to crush the ρrø-Western government in Kyiv and drag the country back into Moscow’s orbit.

But so far, U.S. officials and military experts say, what Russia has unleashed appears to be hypersonic hype about a potentially devastating weapon.

“It’s a bit of a head-scratcher to be honest with you,” a Pentagon official told NBC News on Monday. “If it’s true, why would you need a hypersonic missile fired from not that far away to hit a building?”

Military experts said the only reason Russian President Vladimir Putin would resort to using this kind of weaponry against the outgunned Ukrainians at this point would be to score propaganda points.

“Russia doesn’t have many of them and, frankly, doesn’t need to use them in this conflict,” said Mark Cancian of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “They’re very, very fast and designed to evade missile defenses.”

If Russia did fire such a weapon, it would be more for propaganda value to let Ukraine and the rest of the world know "they’ve got them and will use them,” he said.

President Joe Biden said late Monday that Russia had "launched their hypersonic missile because it’s the only thing that they can get through with absolute certainty." He described it as a "consequential weapon," but added that "with the same warhead on it as as any other launch missile, it doesn’t make that much difference except it’s almost impossible to stop it."

"There’s a reason for using it,” Biden added.

Earlier, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin refused to “confirm or dispute” Moscow’s assertion that it destroyed an underground warehouse in the western Ivano-Frankivsk region of Ukraine with hypersonic missiles called Kinzhals.

“I would not see it as a game changer,” the Pentagon chief said of the hypersonic missiles Sunday on CBS’ "Face the Nation."

“I think the reason (Putin) is resorting to using these types of weapons is because he is trying to re-establish some momentum,” Austin said. “And again, we’ve seen him attack towns and cities and civilians outright (and) we expect that to continue.”

U.S. officials agreed, saying Russia’s use of hypersonic missiles would be viewed as a show of strength by Moscow, but wouldn’t fundamentally change the dynamics of the three-week-old war that began with an invasion by Russian forces and is reaching a bloody stalemate.

The Russians, they said, have more than enough traditional rockets, missiles and other weapons to continue decimating Ukraine’s defenses and cities.

The United States has been working to develop hypersonic missiles since the 2000s, but it continues to lag behind China and Russia.

The next-generation weapons are extra hard to shoot down because of their maneuverability, Cancian said.

Intercontinental ballistic missiles fly much faster, but they travel in a predictable path, making it possible to intercept them before they strike any targets.

But existing U.S. missile defense systems, including the Navy’s Aegis system, would have trouble intercepting hypersonic missiles, the experts said.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

mahirap talaga intercept mga ganyan, kasi kaya nila mag glide below the radar range. at sa subrang bilis, halos hindi na eto matapatan nang mga current anti air missiles. yung only way nalang neto is satellite tracking, tapos anti air laser na kaya mag track/target na subrang bilis.

 

[NOUGHT]

mahirap talaga intercept mga ganyan, kasi kaya nila mag glide below the radar range. at sa subrang bilis, halos hindi na eto matapatan nang mga current anti air missiles. yung only way nalang neto is satellite tracking, tapos anti air laser na kaya mag track/target na subrang bilis.

you can track but cannot be intercepted hopefully walang ganito ang russia kundi matatalo ang nato sa huli tayo din ang kawawa

 

[Away From Keyboard]

you can track but cannot be intercepted hopefully walang ganito ang russia kundi matatalo ang nato sa huli tayo din ang kawawa

hindi yan ma track kasi nag glide yan in low altitude.

 

[PHC-MATON]

Wag naman sana

 

[T Y R A N T]

China wants Taiwan. Wag lang tayo makigulo kaya naka depende yung destiny ng Philippines sa next President natin. If our next President Tuta ng USA then i will buy plane ticket.

Philippines will be the next to Ukraine.
Sana stay neutral lang.

 

[telphel]

nako buti sana kun suntokan lang mangyayari eeh may laban tayu. piru geyra yan sandata ang gamit hindi kamao

 

[NOUGHT]

nako buti sana kun suntokan lang mangyayari eeh may laban tayu. piru geyra yan sandata ang gamit hindi kamao

wala po tayong laban
philippines vs china suntukan
philippines 2020 = 109.6 million population
china 2020 = 1.402 billion
spartan kalalabasan