🔒 Closed China Backs Away as Philippines and U.S. Send Impressive Fleet to West Philippine Sea

Status
Not open for further replies.
BB1fKots.jpg

© Provided by Esquire Philippines


In a surprising move, the Philippines sent its strongest response yet against China’s expansion into the West Philippine Sea. Not since 2012 has the Philippines moved its naval forces to the West Philippine Sea to challenge China’s militarization of the area. The move is a highly coordinated response with the United States.

In March, the Philippines reported the presence of 220 Chinese vessels at Julian Felipe Reef. That number has been reduced to fewer than 10 as of April 13.

"The Chinese have blinked," retired U.S. Navy officer Jerry Hendrix told You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Below are photos taken by the Philippine Coast Guard on April 13 and 14 showing Philippine and Chinese vessels at Julian Felipe Reef.

BB1fKy6j.jpg

© Provided by Esquire Philippines
Photo by Philippine Coast Guard.
BB1fKotB.jpg

© Provided by Esquire Philippines
Photo by Philippine Coast Guard.
BB1fKotG.jpg

© Provided by Esquire Philippines
Photo by Philippine Coast Guard.
BB1fKs9n.jpg

© Provided by Esquire Philippines

Photo by Philippine Coast Guard.
The Philippines sent four of its most advanced warships to the West Philippine Sea to challenge China’s increasing activities at Julian Felipe Reef. Among the units it deployed are its two brand-new missile-guided frigates, the BRP Jose Rizal and the BRP Antonio Luna. It also deployed warplanes to monitor the area.

Meanwhile, the U.S. also sent its aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt to the area. But an American aircraft carrier never travels alone. With every sighting of a U.S. carrier, you can expect it brings along a large ****** of submarines, destroyers, and cruisers protecting it from other vessels. This is on top of the dozens of aircraft it carries (it can carry up to 90 aircraft and can accommodate 4,500 personnel).

The U.S. also deployed the USS Makin Island, a formidable assault ship that can carry up to 20 attack aircraft or s†éálth strike-fighters. It also has its own escorts of submarines, destroyers, and cruisers.

USS Theodore Roosevelt

BB1fKvN6.jpg

© Provided by Esquire Philippines
Photo by United States Navy | Public Domain.

USS Makin Island

BB1fKiSU.jpg

© Provided by Esquire Philippines
Photo by United States Navy | Public Domain.
In March 2021, the Philippine Coast Guard raised the alarm over the presence of 220 Chinese ships forming a phalanx at Julian Felipe Reef, which is within the country’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ). It was what prompted the coordinated military response from the Philippines and the United States.

By April, the Chinese vessels have dissipated to a couple of dozen, a clear sign of China backing down in response to the forceful reaction from the Philippines and the U.S.

China used the same strategy in the past whenever it wanted to militarize a Philippine reef: It would send a large flotilla of paramilitary "fishing boats" to the area to scare away other vessels, then its dredgers would follow, destroying precious corals to create artificial islands over the reef. Julian Felipe Reef would have ended up with the same fate.

An Unexpected Philippine Response​

Ever since the 2012 standoff at Scarborough Shoal between China and the Philippines, the latter has opted not to send warships from the navy but relied on vessels from the Philippine Coast Guard instead to assert its presence in the West Philippine Sea. It was because of the ongoing international arbitration with China that the Philippines eventually won in 2016—the Philippines did not want to jeopardize its case and be construed as an aggressor.

But ever since then, the country had downplayed Chinese incursions into the West Philippine Sea.

The latest development proves significant, not only because the Philippines actually challenged China, but also because it is the first time it has sent a weapon of war to assert itself. To the Chinese generals, that is something to be very serious about. Historically, China respects force, no matter how seemingly small it is.

BRP Jose Rizal

BB1fKs9D.jpg©
Provided by Esquire Philippines
Photo by Philippine Navy | Public Domain.

China Respects Force​

According to professor and geopolitical analyst Richard Heydarian, China respects power.

"Chinese statecraft has contempt for the weak and the naive," Heydarian told Esquire Philippines in 2020. "But China grudgingly respects those with strategic dignity and courage."

For example, Indonesia, which has taken a very strong stance against China on its sea disputes and even sunk a number of confiscated Chinese vessels, has already received 1.2 million initial doses of the vaccine delivered from China in November. Another 1.8 million doses were delivered in January, and more are expected to come.

It also helps that the U.S. has specifically stated any attack on Philippine vessels would trigger its Mutual Defense Treaty obligations.

"An armed attack against the Philippines armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft in the Pacific, including in the South China Sea, will trigger our obligations under the Mutual Defense Treaty," the U.S. State Department You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

In the past, the U.S. had been vague about the Mutual Defense Treaty and its scope, saying obligations would only be triggered if they happen within the Philippines’ territorial waters, not its EEZ. It looks like they are changing that position now.

In any case, it looks like China will not be militarizing Julian Felipe Reef anytime soon.

Esquire Philippines is now on You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. Download the app You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. to read more articles from your favorite websites.

FROM: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

🇵🇭+🇺🇸=💪
 
[XX='Frustrated Burger, c: 1093929, m: 940265'][/XX]
Sa dami ng napatay na inosente sa war on drug niya natatawa nalang ako sa sinasabi niya na yan.

"The Paracel Islands, called Xisha Islands (西沙群岛; Xīshā Qúndǎo) in You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and Hoang Sa Islands (Quần Đảo Hoàng Sa) in You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., lie in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. approximately equidistant from the coastlines of the PRC and Vietnam (200 You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.). With no native population, the archipelago’s ownership has been in dispute since the early 20th century.

China first asserted sovereignty in the modern sense to the South China Sea’s islands when it formally objected[You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.] to France’s efforts to incorporate them into French Indochina during the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. (1884–1885). Initially, France recognized You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.'s sovereignty[You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.] over the Paracel and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., in exchange for Chinese recognition of Vietnam as a French territory. Chinese maps since then have consistently shown China’s claims, first as a solid and then as a dashed line."

So di ko alam kung kanino ba talaga dapat kasi kumbaga nasa boundary nila pareho.

Iba ang case natin sa Vietnam yung saatin na recognize na talagang saatin kasi nga nanalo na tayo sa maritime arbitration case.

Kaya nag karoon ng patayan kasi nga nag engage sila sabi nga sa isang article "Vietnam — as one of the claimants and perhaps the most STUBBORN"

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Oh malamang nag engage sila eh mag kakaroon talaga ng palitan ng putok but still it didn't lit up a war.

Gaya nga ng isa sa comment ko sa taas di naman tayo makikipag giyera kahit yung military presence lang sa teritoryo natin okay na hindi yung pinabayaan lang.
 
[XX='Ooooooooo, c: 1093966, m: 1757659'][/XX] D po 2 days ang sinasabi ko na india china border conflict. Pakistan and china has been at it for so long din kaya may kanya2 silang military posts sa himalayas. You should brush up on international news. It's currently ongoing started may 2020 pa.
 
[XX='bananamilk, c: 1093985, m: 1464212'][/XX] Nakakalito ka kausap sabi mo kasi "skirmish pertains dun sa gyera2 thingy na pinag uusapan nyo" eh yung pinag uusapan pa namin yung Battle of the Paracel Islands which is 2 days lang.
 
[XX='Ooooooooo, c: 1093992, m: 1757659'][/XX] wrong example ang paracel kaya I'm pointing out current events pertaining to territory dispute hahahahhahahahhahah. Pero kung trip nyo magpataasan ng alam sa history go mga papi 🤣
 
@bananamilk..Nakakalito ka kausap sabi mo kasi "skirmish pertains dun sa gyera2 thingy na @B..pinag uusapan nyo[/B]" eh yung pinag uusapan pa namin yung Battle of the Paracel Islands which is 2 days lang.
ang alam lang kasi gyera agad kahit china pa yan di yan papalag dahil damay lahat yan
 
[XX='bananamilk, c: 1094004, m: 1464212'][/XX] Well that's not the point, you interfered saying "Skirmish ang dictionary definition na hinahanap nyo" we were talking about the Paracel.
 
Eto confused ata ang both sides you're all on the extremes with nothing in between.

Territory conflict is prevalent hindi lang satin nangyayari yan. Yung example ko na India vs China very recent in fact its ongoing. Both countries are in peace talks pero merong sagupaan with death every few weeks. May tension because of the Himalayan borders. Eto might vs might. In this example ang india lumalaban with might kasi military power ang india.

Sa atin ayaw dw ni duts ni isang pilipino ang mamatay. That's commendable but at what cost. Now comes his strategy na magpa cute sa china in the hopes na China gives us leway. Kasi during trump era hindi interesado si trump mg protect ng other countries. Remember his "make America great again" platform. People fail to understand wala tayong kakampi that time. Again sa online lang tayo mapatapang maka ngawa ng parang may alam. The Philippines cannot attack any country because our constitution provides that we are only capable of defensive war. Hindi pwede mauna ang pilipinas in a fire fight with another country.

Gyera sa bisaya is I think an all encompassing word for any sort of bloodbath. Correct me if I'm wrong. Palitan ng putok is like gyera already in bisaya I suppose?
 
Ganyan kasi kababaw utak ng iba, mag labas lang ng military sa teritoryo natin eh giyera na agad. Siguro pag may dumaan na truck ng AFP sa lugar nila iniisip nila may giyera na :LOL:
 
Pero hindi yan giyera, usapan giyera kasi sabi mo sa verge of war na tayo.

The Battle of the Paracel Islands was a military engagement between the naval forces of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. on January 19, 1974.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

From 1974 pa pala hmm very relevant today :LOL: 2 days lang tapos nag uwian na sila. It's just a conflict NOT WAR!
After ng battle of paracel,
Next nangyari Sino-Vietnam War 1979
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2021-04-17-22-21-49-08.webp
    Screenshot_2021-04-17-22-21-49-08.webp
    70.1 KB · Views: 18
  • Screenshot_2021-04-17-22-33-08-11.webp
    Screenshot_2021-04-17-22-33-08-11.webp
    71.8 KB · Views: 19
I tried to correct kasi the term kasi nga d yun gyera. Ang war ginagamit very loosely lahat nalang 🤣. May peace talks muna kung gusto ng gyera. Parties must be brought to the table b4 an armed conflict between sovereign nations. May brewing process kasi yan. 🤷‍♂️
 
Wag mo na ipilit masyadong irelevant na yan, basahin mo itong line na to sa article na yan:

"China launched an offensive in response to Vietnam's You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in 1978, which ended the rule of the Chinese-backed You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.."

So that means its just a response from China, kasi ang nangyayari kinocolonize ng Vietnam yung Cambodia

"Vietnam frequently intervened in Cambodia. In 1813, You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. gained the Cambodian throne with the help of Vietnam, and under his rule Cambodia became a You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. Following his death in 1834, Vietnam colonised Cambodia; it was governed under a Vietnamese administration and termed a Vietnamese "province".You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. Throughout the 1830s, Vietnam attempted to erase You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., which had derived the basis of Cambodian society, dress, and religion from India rather than China."

"In spite of the fighting, the leaders of reunified Vietnam and Kampuchea made several public diplomatic exchanges throughout 1976 to highlight the supposedly strong relations between them. However, behind the scenes, Kampuchean leaders continued to fear what they perceived as Vietnamese expansionism. Therefore, on 30 April 1977, they launched another major military attack on Vietnam. Shocked by the Kampuchean assault, Vietnam launched a retaliatory strike at the end of 1977 in an attempt to force the Kampuchean government to negotiate. The Vietnamese military withdrew in January 1978, even though its political objectives had not been achieved; the Khmer Rouge remained unwilling to negotiate seriously."


You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

So sa madaling sabi rumesbak lang yung China sa Cambodia.

Wag mo na kasi ipilit ang layo na nitong mga pinag sasasabi mo masyado ng irelevant.
 
Maraming dahilan kung bakit nagka giera yan sila,

Thereason cited for the attack was to support China's ally, the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia, in addition to the mistreatment of Vietnam's ethnic Chinese minority and the Vietnamese occupation of the Spratly Islands which were claimed by China.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
 
[XX='Ooooooooo, c: 1094013, m: 1757659'][/XX] sabi mo hindi gyera while gyera ang tawag nya so I said technically it's not gyera it's called a skirmish.


I gave example kasi old news yung pinagtatalunan nyo para nga current events.

When you said conflict I gave you examples ulit kasi conflict is not what you called something na may encounter dugo and all. Conflict is the palaman for the barilan kung baga. So technically mali kayong dalawa sa gyera2 na pina uusapan nyo. Yun lang bow🤷‍♂️
 
[XX='bananamilk, c: 1094155, m: 1464212'][/XX] No! ang gulo gulo mo promise, siya yung nag sasabi ng giyera blablabla ako sabi ko hindi iyon giyera. Gaya nga ng sabi ko sa taas kung hindi mo binasa eto "Ok skirmish yung barilan nila ng 2 days xD. I was pointing on the whole thing." The whole thing was a conflict between the two kasi pareho silang may interes sa isla na yun. Yun yung sinasabi ko.
 
[XX='Ooooooooo, c: 1094163, m: 1757659'][/XX] at nauwi nga sa giera yon after ng battle of paracel, check nyo sino-vietnamese war, makikita nyo doon ang mga dahilan kumbakit nagka giera yan china at vietnam noon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About this Thread

  • 182
    Replies
  • 5K
    Views
  • 33
    Participants
Last reply from:
bananamilk

Trending Topics

Online now

Members online
717
Guests online
1,416
Total visitors
2,133

Forum statistics

Threads
2,271,631
Posts
28,936,955
Members
1,238,737
Latest member
baldo1999
Back
Top