🕯️ Traditions Tanong na wala pang nakasagot tungkol sa bibliya

Status
Not open for further replies.
Exodus 3:15

Elohim said to Moses, "Says to the Esraelities,
- ' YHWH ,, the El of your fathers-
the El of Abraham, of Jacob -
has sent me to you,'
" This is My NAME forever, the NAME you shall call me fom generation to genaration.

Gusto ng Ama na tatawagin siya sa pangalang gusto niya , (pansinin)
ganito nagpakilala ang Elohim sa lahi ni shem pababa hangang sa hebrews,
Samantalang hindi naman nag pakilala ang Elohim sa lahi ni japeth na mga gentiles/ europeans , sa genesis chapter 10 .
Kaya dahil dyan gumawa din sila ng pangalan na ipinasok sa biblia na nakarating naman sa atin at sa buong mundo
Batas na ipinagbabawal ng MAHIGPIT sa kingdom of Israel

Exodus 23:
13 “Be careful (A)to do everything I have said to you. Do not invoke the names of other gods;(You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) do not let them be heard on your lips.(You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.)

Klaro po?
 

Why it is Highly Probable That the Hebrew Word 'Ehyeh' is Mistranslated as "I AM" at Exodus 3:14​


The two main points to be made about Exodus 3:14 in the original Hebrew are: (1) the word sometimes translated "I AM" in English is not the name of God but merely an explanation of the meaning of his only personal name ("Jehovah" - English form; "Yahweh" - possible Hebrew form), and (2) translating that Hebrew word (ehyeh) as "I Am" is probably incorrect.

The high probability is that ehyeh is mistranslated as "I am". Consider how ehyeh is translated at Ex. 3:14 in the following Bibles: Moffatt's translation - "I WILL BE"; Byington's - "I WILL BE"; Rotherham's - "I WILL BECOME"; New World Translation - "I SHALL PROVE TO BE." In addition were the following alternate readings in footnotes: American Standard Version - "I WILL BE"; NIV Study Bible - "I WILL BE"; Revised Standard Version - "I WILL BE"; New Revised Standard Version - "I WILL BE"; New English Bible - "I WILL BE"; Revised English Bible - "I WILL BE"; Living Bible - "I WILL BE"; Good News Bible - "I WILL BE."
Notice how this respected Bible translates Ex, 3:14:
"And God said to Moses, `Ehyeh (hyh))-Asher-Ehyeh.' (a) He continues, `Thus shall you say to the Israelites, "Ehyeh (b) sent me to you."'" – Tanakh, JPS, 1985.
Tanakh Footnotes:
"(a) Meaning of Heb, uncertain; variously translated: "I Am That I Am; "I Am Who I AM; I Will Be What I Will Be; etc."
"(b) Others "I AM or "I Will Be."
And even one of the earliest English translations renders it:
14 God saide vnto Moses: I wyl be what I wyll be. And he sayde: Thus shalt thou saye vnto ye children of Israel: I wyl be hath sent me vnto you. - Miles Coverdale Bible (1535).
Notice too what the Encyclopedia Britannica had to say on this subject:
"The writer [of Exodus 3:14-15] ... explains it [the meaning of God's name] by the phrase EHYEH asher EHYEH (Ex. iii., 14); this can be translated `I am that I am' or moreexactly[/B] 'I am wont to be that which I am wont to be' or [B]I will be that which I will be .'" - p. 995, 14th ed., v. 12.

Although it takes some effort to further check out the meaning of ehyeh, it is worth it. With a good Hebrew-English Interlinear Bible you can prove to yourself that ehyeh should be translated "I will be" (or a similar rendering) at Ex. 3:14.

In contrast to the paucity of evidence for an "I am" interpretation of ehyeh you will find that all of the books of Moses (the Pentateuch), including Exodus, of course, and the book of Joshua always use ehyeh to mean "I will be." Check out the various translations of these scriptures where they occur. A Hebrew interlinear will back this up.
 
In the Hebrew Scriptures, the word ʼelohʹah (god) has two plural forms, namely, ʼelo·himʹ (gods) and ʼelo·hehʹ (gods of). These plural forms generally refer to Jehovah, in which case they are translated in the singular as “God.” Do these plural forms indicate a Trinity? No, they do not. In A Dictionary of the Bible, William Smith says: “The fanciful idea that [ʼelo·himʹ] referred to the trinity of persons in the Godhead hardly finds now a supporter among scholars. It is either what grammarians call the plural of majesty, or it denotes the fullness of divine strength, the sum of the powers displayed by God.”

The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures says of ʼelo·himʹ: “It is almost invariably construed with a singular verbal predicate, and takes a singular adjectival attribute.” To illustrate this, the title ʼelo·himʹ appears 35 times by itself in the account of creation, and every time the verb describing what God said and did is singular. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Thus, that publication concludes: “[ʼElo·himʹ] must rather be explained as an intensive plural, denoting greatness and majesty.”

ʼElo·himʹ
means, not “persons,” but “gods.” So those who argue that this word implies a Trinity make themselves polytheists, worshipers of more than one God. Why? Because it would mean that there were three gods in the Trinity. But nearly all Trinity supporters reject the view that the Trinity is made up of three separate gods.

The Bible also uses the words ʼelo·himʹ and ʼelo·hehʹ when referring to a number of false idol gods. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) But at other times it may refer to just a single false god, as when the Philistines referred to “Dagon their god [ʼelo·hehʹ].” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Baal is called “a god [ʼelo·himʹ].” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) In addition, the term is used for humans. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Moses was told that he was to serve as “God” [ʼelo·himʹ] to Aaron and to Pharaoh.—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Obviously, using the titles ʼelo·himʹ and ʼelo·hehʹ for false gods, and even humans, did not imply that each was a plurality of gods; neither does applying ʼelo·himʹ or ʼelo·hehʹ to Jehovah mean that he is more than one person, especially when we consider the testimony of the rest of the Bible on this subject.
 
Exodus 3:15

Elohim said to Moses, "Says to the Esraelities,
- ' YHWH ,, the El of your fathers-
the El of Abraham, of Jacob -
has sent me to you,'
" This is My NAME forever, the NAME you shall call me fom generation to genaration.

Gusto ng Ama na tatawagin siya sa pangalang gusto niya , (pansinin)
ganito nagpakilala ang Elohim sa lahi ni shem pababa hangang sa hebrews,
Samantalang hindi naman nag pakilala ang Elohim sa lahi ni japeth na mga gentiles/ europeans , sa genesis chapter 10 .
Kaya dahil dyan gumawa din sila ng pangalan na ipinasok sa biblia na nakarating naman sa atin at sa buong mundo
Batas na ipinagbabawal ng MAHIGPIT sa kingdom of Israel

Exodus 23:
13 “Be careful (A)to do everything I have said to you. Do not invoke the names of other gods;(You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) do not let them be heard on your lips.(You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.)

Klaro po?
Sorry, pero sobrang labo hehehe. pero salamat sa share.
 
In the Hebrew Scriptures, the word ʼelohʹah (god) has two plural forms, namely, ʼelo·himʹ (gods) and ʼelo·hehʹ (gods of). These plural forms generally refer to Jehovah, in which case they are translated in the singular as “God.” Do these plural forms indicate a Trinity? No, they do not. In A Dictionary of the Bible, William Smith says: “The fanciful idea that [ʼelo·himʹ] referred to the trinity of persons in the Godhead hardly finds now a supporter among scholars. It is either what grammarians call the plural of majesty, or it denotes the fullness of divine strength, the sum of the powers displayed by God.”

The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures says of ʼelo·himʹ: “It is almost invariably construed with a singular verbal predicate, and takes a singular adjectival attribute.” To illustrate this, the title ʼelo·himʹ appears 35 times by itself in the account of creation, and every time the verb describing what God said and did is singular. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Thus, that publication concludes: “[ʼElo·himʹ] must rather be explained as an intensive plural, denoting greatness and majesty.”

ʼElo·himʹ
means, not “persons,” but “gods.” So those who argue that this word implies a Trinity make themselves polytheists, worshipers of more than one God. Why? Because it would mean that there were three gods in the Trinity. But nearly all Trinity supporters reject the view that the Trinity is made up of three separate gods.

The Bible also uses the words ʼelo·himʹ and ʼelo·hehʹ when referring to a number of false idol gods. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) But at other times it may refer to just a single false god, as when the Philistines referred to “Dagon their god [ʼelo·hehʹ].” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Baal is called “a god [ʼelo·himʹ].” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) In addition, the term is used for humans. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Moses was told that he was to serve as “God” [ʼelo·himʹ] to Aaron and to Pharaoh.—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Obviously, using the titles ʼelo·himʹ and ʼelo·hehʹ for false gods, and even humans, did not imply that each was a plurality of gods; neither does applying ʼelo·himʹ or ʼelo·hehʹ to Jehovah mean that he is more than one person, especially when we consider the testimony of the rest of the Bible on this subject.


Kasi nga corrupted yung bible mu kaya hindi lumilinaw sayo hahaha
Designed yan sa european framework balikan mu ung mga post koh sir at pwede ko pang dagdagan kung ok lng sa inyo ni ace maraming maraming marami pa akong itatanong eh hahahah kaso takbuhin naman si pakner mu hahahah,meron kanga pala naiwanan dun sa kabilang thread mu sir yung tungkol sa son of destruction baka gusto mu balikan yun sir? Kung wala kang balak balikan yun ipa close mu nalang yun sir hahahah

Peace .... hahahah
 
you guys are way far ahead of enlightenment, the bible and it's doctrines was meant to enslave a mind and which possesses a dogmatic beliefs of the SYSTEM. we are good in nature, you don't need a bible to tell you are good and lived with burden. Don't let that Manipulative sad ole' bible you owe' a life...

nuff said
 
In the Hebrew Scriptures, the word ʼelohʹah (god) has two plural forms, namely, ʼelo·himʹ (gods) and ʼelo·hehʹ (gods of). These plural forms generally refer to Jehovah, in which case they are translated in the singular as “God.” Do these plural forms indicate a Trinity? No, they do not. In A Dictionary of the Bible, William Smith says: “The fanciful idea that [ʼelo·himʹ] referred to the trinity of persons in the Godhead hardly finds now a supporter among scholars. It is either what grammarians call the plural of majesty, or it denotes the fullness of divine strength, the sum of the powers displayed by God.”

The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures says of ʼelo·himʹ: “It is almost invariably construed with a singular verbal predicate, and takes a singular adjectival attribute.” To illustrate this, the title ʼelo·himʹ appears 35 times by itself in the account of creation, and every time the verb describing what God said and did is singular. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Thus, that publication concludes: “[ʼElo·himʹ] must rather be explained as an intensive plural, denoting greatness and majesty.”

ʼElo·himʹ
means, not “persons,” but “gods.” So those who argue that this word implies a Trinity make themselves polytheists, worshipers of more than one God. Why? Because it would mean that there were three gods in the Trinity. But nearly all Trinity supporters reject the view that the Trinity is made up of three separate gods.

The Bible also uses the words ʼelo·himʹ and ʼelo·hehʹ when referring to a number of false idol gods. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) But at other times it may refer to just a single false god, as when the Philistines referred to “Dagon their god [ʼelo·hehʹ].” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Baal is called “a god [ʼelo·himʹ].” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) In addition, the term is used for humans. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Moses was told that he was to serve as “God” [ʼelo·himʹ] to Aaron and to Pharaoh.—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Obviously, using the titles ʼelo·himʹ and ʼelo·hehʹ for false gods, and even humans, did not imply that each was a plurality of gods; neither does applying ʼelo·himʹ or ʼelo·hehʹ to Jehovah mean that he is more than one person, especially when we consider the testimony of the rest of the Bible on this subject.
YHWH nga sir malabo na sayo eh samantalang 4 letters lang po yan anu pa kaya iyong higit pa sa 4 letter
And huwag nyu po problemahin ung Elohim hindi po yan pangalan Reputation po yan (shem/sham)
Hahaha
 
you guys are way far ahead of enlightenment, the bible and it's doctrines was meant to enslave a mind and which possesses a dogmatic beliefs of the SYSTEM. we are good in nature, you don't need a bible to tell you are good and lived with burden. Don't let that Manipulative sad ole' bible you owe' a life...

nuff said
Dogmatic kah dyan ,,
Latag mu baka malangsa din yan
Hahahah
peace.....
 
Dogmatic kah dyan ,,
Latag mu baka malangsa din yan
Hahahah
peace.....
Ok na yun.. enjoy mo nalang kung ano paniniwala mo.. sayang kung pag aaksayahan pa ng panahon ang kagaya mo halata naman na hindi ka interesado sa katotohanan at may pagkahambog kapa. Hehehe. Marami pa naman kami pwede kausapin dito hindi lang ikaw..
 
Ok na yun.. enjoy mo nalang kung ano paniniwala mo.. sayang kung pag aaksayahan pa ng panahon ang kagaya mo halata naman na hindi ka interesado sa katotohanan at may pagkahambog kapa. Hehehe. Marami pa naman kami pwede kausapin dito hindi lang ikaw..
Wow hiyanghiya naman ako sir,
Mukhang ikaw itong AYAW at TUMATANGGI sa REALITY.....
hahahahaha,
Kawawa talaga sir yong mga taong napaniniwala nyo sir hindi sila makaka avail ng salvation dahil itinuturok nyo sa kanila ung nakapakalaking kamalian...
Uuwe at uuwe ang mga anak sa kanyang nanay ang harlot woman the mistery of great babilon
 
Wow hiyanghiya naman ako sir,
Mukhang ikaw itong AYAW at TUMATANGGI sa REALITY.....
hahahahaha,
Kawawa talaga sir yong mga taong napaniniwala nyo sir hindi sila makaka avail ng salvation dahil itinuturok nyo sa kanila ung nakapakaling kamalian...
Uuwe at uuwe ang mga anak sa kanyang nanay ang harlot woman the mistery of great babilon
Hindi ginawa ang thread na ito para maniwala mga tao samin o pilitin sila maniwala sa paniniwala namin.. sinasagot ang tanong dito para tulungan ang mga interesado sa katotohanan na masuri kung ang kanilang pinaniniwalaan ay nakabatay sa katotohanan na nasa salita ng Diyos... alam namin na hindi lahat tatanggap gaya mo... Kaya Enjoy mo nalang kung ano mga pinaniniwalaan mo... hindi ako interesado makipag usap sa kagaya mo... peace.. hehehe.
 
[XX='thy-wilt, c: 824146, m: 633393'][/XX] It sounds an opinion not base on experience.

the bible and it's doctrines was meant to enslave a mind and which possesses a dogmatic beliefs of the SYSTEM.
- so you are slave also with your own system? or you are slave sa systema ng pilipinas?

we are good in nature
- does cannibalisms exist today?

you don't need a bible to tell you are good and lived with burden.
- in following the teaching of Jesus you don't need to tell that I am good it is a fruit nalang yan sa pag sunod mo. We don't have any burden we live happily. Nasa win-win situation po kami.
 

Mga Panalanging Dinirinig ng Diyos

“Patuloy na humingi, at ibibigay ito sa inyo; patuloy na maghanap, at kayo ay makasusumpong; patuloy na kumatok, at bubuksan ito sa inyo. Sapagkat bawat isa na humihingi ay tumatanggap, at bawat isa na naghahanap ay nakasusumpong, at sa bawat isa na kumakatok ay bubuksan ito.”—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

SA PAGPAPAKITA ng lubusang pagtitiwala sa mga sinabi ni Jesu-Kristo na sinipi sa itaas, idinudulog sa panalangin sa Diyos ng maraming Kristiyano ang kanilang mga problema at mga kabalisahan, anupat nakatitiyak na kaniyang minamahal at pinagmamalasakitan sila. Subalit ang ilan ay nakararanas ng pagkasiphayo habang hinihintay nila ang kasagutan sa kanilang mga panalangin. Nadarama mo ba na parang walang-bisa ang iyong mga panalangin? Nakikinig nga ba ang Diyos kapag nananalangin ka?

Kahit na waring hindi sinasagot ang ating mga panalangin, hindi ito nangangahulugan na hindi naririnig ng Diyos ang mga ito. Tinitiyak sa atin ng Bibliya: “Ang mga mata ni Jehova ay nasa mga matuwid, at ang kaniyang mga tainga ay nakatuon sa kanilang pagsusumamo.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Sa gayon, naririnig ng Diyos na Jehova ang mga panalangin ng matutuwid na tao, ito man ay binibigkas nang malakas o sinasambit mula sa puso. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Sinusuri rin ni Jehova ang mga kaisipan at mga damdamin na nasa likod ng bawat panalangin, na maaaring hindi lubusang nauunawaan ni nababatid man maging ng taong nananalangin.—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Gayunman, kailangang matugunan ng mga panalangin ang ilang kahilingan para tanggapin ng Diyos ang mga ito. Una, ang mga ito ay dapat na sa Diyos lamang idulog—hindi kay Jesus, sa isang “santo,” o sa isang idolo. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Ang mga panalangin ay dapat ding ipaabot sa pangalan ng Anak ng Diyos, si Jesu-Kristo. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Nangangahulugan ba ito na dinirinig muna ni Jesus ang ating mga panalangin at pagkatapos ay inihahatid niya ang mensahe sa Diyos? Hindi. Sa halip, sa pamamagitan ng pananalangin kay Jehova sa pangalan ni Jesus, ipinakikilala natin ang ating mga sarili bilang mga alagad ni Kristo at kinikilala natin na dahilan lamang sa kaniyang pantubos kung kaya tayo ay nakalalapit sa Diyos.—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Dapat manalangin nang may pananampalataya. Sinabi ni apostol Pablo: “Kung walang pananampalataya ay imposibleng palugdan [ang Diyos] nang lubos, sapagkat siya na lumalapit sa Diyos ay dapat na maniwala na siya nga ay umiiral at na siya ang nagiging tagapagbigay-gantimpala doon sa mga may-pananabik na humahanap sa kaniya.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Paano nalalaman ng isang tao kung taglay niya ang ganiyang uri ng pananampalataya? Ganito ang sagot ng manunulat sa Bibliya na si Santiago: “Ipakikita ko sa iyo ang aking pananampalataya sa pamamagitan ng aking mga gawa.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Oo, pinakikilos tayo ng pananampalataya, at ipinakikita naman ng ating mga pagkilos na iniibig natin ang Diyos at sinisikap nating palugdan siya.

Ang mga mananamba ng Diyos ay dapat ding maging matiyaga sa pananalangin. Niliwanag ito ni Jesus sa You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., gaya ng sinipi sa simula. Tutal, kung minsan lamang ipinananalangin ng isang tao ang tungkol sa isang bagay, hindi ba’t ipinahihiwatig nito na hindi talaga siya seryoso hinggil sa kaniyang hinihiling?

Kung Ano ang Ipinangangako ng Diyos

Gaano man kadalas at kataimtim tayo manalangin, nabubuhay pa rin tayo sa “mga panahong mapanganib na mahirap pakitunguhan.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Bagaman totoong sinabi ni Jesus na magiging maligaya ang kaniyang mga tagasunod, hindi naman niya sinabi na magiging walang problema ang kanilang mga buhay. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Ngunit sinabi niya na maaaring maging maligaya ang kaniyang mga alagad sa kabila ng pagdadalamhati, pagkagutom, pagkauhaw, o pag-uusig.

Ang kaligayahan na binanggit ni Jesus ay hindi nakadepende sa pagkakaroon natin ng magandang kalagayan sa buhay. Sa halip, ito ang tinataglay nating panloob na pagkakontento dahil sa naglilingkod tayo sa Diyos. Dahil dito, maaari nating tamuhin ang isang antas ng kaligayahan maging sa gitna ng maunos na kalagayan.—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Pagharap sa Personal na mga Problema

Kung gayon, walang-kabuluhan ba na ipanalangin sa Diyos ang hinggil sa personal na mga bagay gaya ng paghanap ng isang angkop na mapapangasawa o pagharap sa mga problema sa pamilya, kalusugan, o trabaho? Hindi naman, bagaman hindi ipinangangako ng Diyos na makahimalang babaguhin niya ang mga kalagayan ng ating buhay, bibigyan niya tayo ng karunungan upang harapin nang matagumpay ang mga ito. Ganito ang isinulat ni Santiago may kinalaman sa mga pagsubok: “Kung ang sinuman sa inyo ay nagkukulang ng karunungan, patuloy siyang humingi sa Diyos, sapagkat siya ay saganang nagbibigay sa lahat at hindi nandurusta; at ibibigay ito sa kaniya.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Kaya sa pamamagitan ng kaniyang banal na espiritu, papatnubayan tayo ni Jehova. Makatutulong ito upang maunawaan natin at maikapit ang mga simulain sa Bibliya sa paggawa ng mga desisyon.

Mangyari pa, hindi ang espiritu ng Diyos ang siyang gumagawa ng pasiya para sa atin. Sa kabaligtaran, kailangan ang personal na pagsisikap. Halimbawa, kung may problema tayo, sinaliksik na ba natin ang hinggil dito at sinuri ang iba’t ibang aspekto at panig ng situwasyon? Isa itong pagkilos na nagpapakita sa Diyos na tayo ay may pananampalataya. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Naging matiyaga ba tayo sa paglutas ng ating problema, anupat patuluyang humihiling ng patnubay ng Diyos? (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Maingat ba nating sinuri ang mga simulain ng Bibliya na kumakapit sa situwasyon? Maaari tayong gawin ng Salita ng Diyos na ‘lubusang nasasangkapan ukol sa bawat mabuting gawa.’—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Bagaman totoo na maaaring mamagitan ang Diyos sa mga nangyayari sa buhay ng tao at alisin ang lahat ng problema natin, pinahintulutan niya tayong ipakita ang ating kalayaang magpasiya. Nakalulungkot naman, ginagamit ng marami ang kanilang kalayaang magpasiya sa ikapapahamak ng iba. Kaya ang ilang problema na ating ipinapanalangin ay maaaring magpatuloy hanggang sa bagong sanlibutan ng Diyos. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Baka ito’y isang kalagayang umiiral kung saan tayo nakatira, gaya ng krimen o laganap na digmaan; o baka sangkot dito ang pinagtitiisan nating pagpapahirap ng mga mananalansang. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Dapat nating mabatid na sa di-makadiyos na sanlibutang ito ay hindi na bubuti pa ang ilang kalagayan.

Magkagayunman, mahal ng Diyos ang kaniyang mga mananamba at gusto niyang tulungan sila. Kapag isinagawa na ng kaniyang Kaharian ang di-matututulang pamamahala nito sa buong lupa, lubusan niyang aalisin ang nakapangingilabot na mga problema sa daigdig na ito. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Hanggang sa pagdating ng panahong iyan, dapat nating matiyagang hilingin ang kaniyang patnubay sa pagharap sa mga problema sa buhay. Kung gayon ang ating gagawin, makatitiyak tayo na tutuparin ni Jehova ang pangako na nakaulat sa Bibliya sa You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.: “Huwag kang matakot, sapagkat ako ay sumasaiyo. Huwag kang luminga-linga, sapagkat ako ang iyong Diyos. Patitibayin kita. Talagang tutulungan kita. Talagang aalalayan kitang mabuti sa pamamagitan ng aking kanang kamay ng katuwiran.”
 
All religion are exclusive even Buddhist and Hindus which is pluralistic are exclusive. Ang kaligtasan ay personal remember this always. So kapag ang kaligtasan ay personal dapat may personal relationship ka sa magliligtas sayo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About this Thread

  • 2K
    Replies
  • 50K
    Views
  • 190
    Participants
Last reply from:
Gentleman007

Online now

Members online
1,099
Guests online
1,259
Total visitors
2,358

Forum statistics

Threads
2,271,470
Posts
28,935,776
Members
1,238,629
Latest member
Coconutbanana22
Back
Top