Sa Kaalaman lang ng lahat ng nakakalimot

 

[philbog1]

hehe ok lang na ex-convict basta convincing ang reason ng pagtakbo at may magandang layunin bossing. Ad hominem na kasi yan kapag inungkat mo pa yung history nila, past is past, let bygones be bygones, ang importante ay ang present bossing hehe

 

[sherjun111]

dapat lang i expose lodi. tama yan.

 

[plhbg1]

this makes people think twice or more, nice

 

[philbog1]

hehe vote pa rin ako kay revilla bossing kasi maganda naman ang layunin niya ngayon. Hehe di na mahalaga yung past niya kasi the score is settled already hehe

 

[wapking]

infairness to leila d. case may verdict na that "she is not guilty".

source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

"innocent until proven guilty" refers to the legal principle of presumption of innocence, where a person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. This means the burden of proof rests on the prosecution to demonstrate the defendant's guilt, not on the defendant to prove their innocence.

meanwhile rodrigo d. he can practice "innocent until proven guilty" card.

source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[000000s]

HAHAH sama mo na din ung may mga pending case, Antitibay ng mga mukha

 

[plhbg1]

infairness to leila d. case may verdict na that "she is not guilty".

mali, not enough evidence lang, hindi not guilty, do not attempt to deceive people bossing

 

[wapking]

mali, not enough evidence lang, hindi not guilty, do not attempt to deceive people bossing

thats the verdict "not guilty nga" sya. hahahah.

she is acquitted sa mga binintang sa kanya.

source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[philbog1]

thats the verdict "not guilty nga" sya. hahahah.

she is acquitted sa mga binintang sa kanya.

source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

hehe you should think twice bossing. Galingan mo next time mag tanong, cheers!

 

[-M I A Z H E R-]

infairness to leila d. case may verdict na that "she is not guilty".

source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

"innocent until proven guilty" refers to the legal principle of presumption of innocence, where a person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. This means the burden of proof rests on the prosecution to demonstrate the defendant's guilt, not on the defendant to prove their innocence.

meanwhile rodrigo d. he can practice "innocent until proven guilty" card.

source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

hahahahaha dito ka nman nagkalat bossing

 

[plhbg1]

thats the verdict "not guilty nga" sya. hahahah.

she is acquitted sa mga binintang sa kanya.

source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

haha asaan diyan ang "not guilty" ipakita mo haha or baka di mo lang alam ang meaning ng "demurrer of evidence" na isinumiti niya sa court na naging dahilan ng case dismissal niya

In the 41-page ruling acquitting De Lima, the judge said the prosecution was able to establish a factual link between Peter Co and Dera but that “the prosecution did not present sufficient evidence to establish Dera’s relationship or connection with De Lima.”

saan diyan ang "not guilty"? haha factual link pa nga sinabi ng judge

 

[-M I A Z H E R-]

 

[philbog1]

hehe kakaibang pik news din yan bossing no? Kasi may hashtag pa na no to pik news hehe

 

[-M I A Z H E R-]

hehe kakaibang pik news din yan bossing no? Kasi may hashtag pa na no to pik news hehe

Jaybee Sebastian with his sidekicks

 

[BicycleHorse]

haha asaan diyan ang "not guilty" ipakita mo haha or baka di mo lang alam ang meaning ng "demurrer of evidence" na isinumiti niya sa court na naging dahilan ng case dismissal niya

In the 41-page ruling acquitting De Lima, the judge said the prosecution was able to establish a factual link between Peter Co and Dera but that “the prosecution did not present sufficient evidence to establish Dera’s relationship or connection with De Lima.”

saan diyan ang "not guilty"? haha factual link pa nga sinabi ng judge

Sinagot mo na sarili mo, di mo pa nakita?

Acquitted means a court has formally declared a person not guilty of the charges against them, effectively clearing them of legal responsibility for the alleged crime. It occurs when the prosecution fails to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, resulting in the defendant's release from those charges.

Courts often use language like "acquitted" or "case dismissed" in rulings, especially when granting a demurrer to evidence, without needing to say "not guilty" verbatim.

Pag pasencyahan mo na at di nya ata naintidihan yung procedure sa loob ng court wapking

 

[plhbg1]

Acquitted means a court has formally declared a person not guilty of the charges against them, effectively clearing them of legal responsibility for the alleged crime. It occurs when the prosecution fails to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, resulting in the defendant's release from those charges.

haha magkaiba yung "not guilty" sa insufficient evidence bossing, palakasa yan ng evidence, need mo ng counter evidence to debunk the prosecution's evidence, si de lima nag demurrer lang siya instead of presenting counter evidences

 

[BicycleHorse]

haha magkaiba yung "not guilty" sa insufficient evidence bossing, palakasa yan ng evidence, need mo ng counter evidence to debunk the prosecution's evidence, si de lima nag demurrer lang siya instead of presenting counter evidences

Ayan naman tayo at tini-TWIST at mini-MISLEAD mo naman yung context ng outcome ng criminal trial.

Kapag sinabing "not guilty" o acquitted, ibig sabihin, hindi napatunayan ng prosecution na guilty ang accused nang walang duda (beyond reasonable doubt). Ang pangunahing dahilan nito ay insufficient evidence, o kulang ang ebidensya ng prosecution para maabot ang standard na kailangan para makasuhan.

Yung burden of proof ay nasa prosecution lang—sila ang kailangang magpatunay na guilty ang accused nang walang duda. Hindi kailangan ng accused na magbigay ng sariling ebidensya o patunayang mali ang prosecution.

Yung demurrer to evidence ay isang motion na isinasampa pagkatapos magpresenta ng ebidensya ang prosecution. Sinasabi nito na kulang ang ebidensya nila para patunayang guilty ang accused. Kung naaprubahan ito, idinidismis ang kaso, at acquitted ang accused kahit hindi na siya magbigay ng sariling depensa.

 

[plhbg1]

Ayan naman tayo at tini-TWIST at mini-MISLEAD mo naman yung context ng outcome ng criminal trial.

Kapag sinabing "not guilty" o acquitted, ibig sabihin, hindi napatunayan ng prosecution na guilty ang accused nang walang duda (beyond reasonable doubt). Ang pangunahing dahilan nito ay insufficient evidence, o kulang ang ebidensya ng prosecution para maabot ang standard na kailangan para makasuhan.

Yung burden of proof ay nasa prosecution lang—sila ang kailangang magpatunay na guilty ang accused nang walang duda. Hindi kailangan ng accused na magbigay ng sariling ebidensya o patunayang mali ang prosecution.

Yung demurrer to evidence ay isang motion na isinasampa pagkatapos magpresenta ng ebidensya ang prosecution. Sinasabi nito na kulang ang ebidensya nila para patunayang guilty ang accused. Kung naaprubahan ito, idinidismis ang kaso, at acquitted ang accused kahit hindi na siya magbigay ng sariling depensa.

haha iba pa rin nga ang mahina ang evidence sa debunked evidence bossing, as i've said hindi na-invalidate ang evidences ng prosecution, naging insufficient lang haha

 

[philbog1]

hehe ang pagiging acquitted bossing ay not equal to being not guilty hehe kahit search mo pa sa webster dictionary. Naexaggerate lang kasi yung power of attorney bossing kaya nagamit yung word na 'acquitted' which is very wrong to use with the case of delima hehe

Ayan naman tayo at tini-TWIST at mini-MISLEAD mo naman yung context ng outcome ng criminal trial.

Kapag sinabing "not guilty" o acquitted, ibig sabihin, hindi napatunayan ng prosecution na guilty ang accused nang walang duda (beyond reasonable doubt). Ang pangunahing dahilan nito ay insufficient evidence, o kulang ang ebidensya ng prosecution para maabot ang standard na kailangan para makasuhan.

Yung burden of proof ay nasa prosecution lang—sila ang kailangang magpatunay na guilty ang accused nang walang duda. Hindi kailangan ng accused na magbigay ng sariling ebidensya o patunayang mali ang prosecution.

Yung demurrer to evidence ay isang motion na isinasampa pagkatapos magpresenta ng ebidensya ang prosecution. Sinasabi nito na kulang ang ebidensya nila para patunayang guilty ang accused. Kung naaprubahan ito, idinidismis ang kaso, at acquitted ang accused kahit hindi na siya magbigay ng sariling depensa.

hehe bossing hindi kami nagmemental gymnastics, sadyang magkaiba lang talaga ang meaning ng mga words na ginagamit natin. May mga synonyms lang kumbaga hehe

haha iba pa rin nga ang mahina ang evidence sa debunked evidence bossing, as i've said hindi na-invalidate ang evidences ng prosecution, naging insufficient lang haha

hehe hindi sila makaintindi ng 'debunked evidence' kaya nahaluan nila ng ibang meaning ang salitang 'acquitted'