Trivia Duterte arrest a double game

images.jpeg

Even as the Marcos administration publicly denounces the International Criminal Court (ICC) and insists on noncooperation, revelations from insiders and legal observers highlight a stark contradiction: the government may have quietly facilitated the arrest of former president Rodrigo Duterte.

Kristina Conti, ICC-accredited lawyer representing victims of the drug war, pointed out in an interview striking inconsistencies in the Philippine government's behavior.

While the Marcos camp has repeatedly emphasized its refusal to cooperate with The Hague-based tribunal, the abruptness of Duterte's arrest suggests a backdoor deal or, at the very least, silent acquiescence.

"This arrest would not have happened if the UniTeam [of the ruling coalition] were still intact," Conti said. "There were developments that pushed the Marcos government to pursue the case."

Conti believes divisions within the "UniTeam" — the 2022 campaign alliance of President Marcos and Vice President Sara Duterte — may have played a pivotal role. Once marketed as a symbol of post-pandemic political stability, the alliance now shows visible cracks, with seething rivalries between factions loyal to the Marcoses and to the Dutertes.

The breakdown appears to have created just enough political distance to allow international legal obligations to take effect — even if no one in Malacañang will admit it.

Despite fiery rhetoric rejecting ICC jurisdiction, key decisions on the ground point to discreet maneuvering. Sources say Philippine officials were engaged in "quiet coordination" with the ICC, particularly involving logistical aspects of the arrest.

"There may have been negotiations with the arresting state," Conti said. "The ICC considers the probability of arrest as a major factor — and this one had a high probability."

She said this double game — denying cooperation while subtly facilitating justice — is emblematic of the Marcos administration's broader strategy: maintaining nationalist bravado for domestic audiences while avoiding international condemnation.

Duterte's arrest may be less about a commitment to justice than about timing and optics. Conti sees it as a calculated move by the Marcos camp to distance itself from the human rights atrocities of the previous administration without explicitly condemning them.

Credits: Franco Jose C. Baroña
 
Deleted yung comment ko na against kay Duterte. Halatadong die hard fan ka ng poon mong Duterte.

Akala ko ba ayaw mo sa mga thread starter na nandedelete ng comment? Wala ka palang pinagkaiba.
toink di lang TS ang may delete power kaya ingat ka since ban evader ka
 
kausapin mo lang boss and you'll know, nawala kasi recent bans page
Draft -Reen- sorry for dragging, i do know we have rules about false information, i am aware den na admins has the capability to delete posts/thread if rules are compromised by a user.

but do the admin really have to delete opnion, or maybe fact sided descrption (not unless they violate the rules) but i am simply asking who is the user, when did this happen and what are the rules applied for post deletion?


really sorry to drag you admins, its just how I use this platform is kinda uncomfortable now with other users. knowing this is not your problem, exit is free anytime -i just wanted an answer to these. feel free delete if not allowed.

Thanks boss Draft
 
Draft -Reen- sorry for dragging, i do know we have rules about false information, i am aware den na admins has the capability to delete posts/thread if rules are compromised by a user.

but do the admin really have to delete opnion, or maybe fact sided descrption (not unless they violate the rules) but i am simply asking who is the user, when did this happen and what are the rules applied for post deletion?


really sorry to drag you admins, its just how I use this platform is kinda uncomfortable now with other users. knowing this is not your problem, exit is free anytime -i just wanted an answer to these. feel free delete if not allowed.

Thanks boss Draft
Deleted Thread & Post Replies.

• Posts containing racism, foul words, bullying, rudeness, discrimination, or threatening others are not allowed.

• ãdül† or mature content

• Reported By Other Members.

• Etc.

The staff has the authority to delete thread/posts, ban if members violate the rules or compromise the harmony of the forum.
 
Draft -Reen- sorry for dragging, i do know we have rules about false information, i am aware den na admins has the capability to delete posts/thread if rules are compromised by a user.

but do the admin really have to delete opnion, or maybe fact sided descrption (not unless they violate the rules) but i am simply asking who is the user, when did this happen and what are the rules applied for post deletion?


really sorry to drag you admins, its just how I use this platform is kinda uncomfortable now with other users. knowing this is not your problem, exit is free anytime -i just wanted an answer to these. feel free delete if not allowed.

Thanks boss Draft
hehe kung ako lang masusunod magsi-stick talaga ako sa freedom of speech (yung absolute freedom talaga) and would never delete anything in my threads, but staff thinks differently and they're higher authority, though ban evasion is a grave offense (and insult to staff) and i would still agree if they ban him again for another reason due to evasion of previous ban
 
Deleted Thread & Post Replies.

• Posts containing racism, foul words, bullying, rudeness, discrimination, or threatening others are not allowed.

• ãdül† or mature content

• Reported By Other Members.

• Etc.

The staff has the authority to delete thread/posts, ban if members violate the rules or compromise the harmony of the forum.
Thanks Admin
 
Mabulok sana yan. Kaawa awa hahaha buti na yan diyan mabulok yan. Bulok kasi justice system dito sa Pinas. Karma is real talaga lalong lalo na ginawa niya kay De lima.
 
Mga paps, base sa recent survey ng sentaorial candidates.
Kakayanin ba makakuha ng 16 senators against Sara kung sakaling madagdagdag sa senate ang mananalo base sa survey? Medyo parang hirap makakuha ng 16.
 
Mga paps, base sa recent survey ng sentaorial candidates.
Kakayanin ba makakuha ng 16 senators against Sara kung sakaling madagdagdag sa senate ang mananalo base sa survey? Medyo parang hirap makakuha ng 16.
hehe malayong makakuha dahil sa power of attorney hehe
 
kahit pa ikot ikotin pa ang bola. may pananagotan pa rin si rody d. sa mga biktima sa mga na ejk nya. na sa icc na. filipino people should wait the verdict and we must respect the rule of law.
 
kahit pa ikot ikotin pa ang bola. may pananagotan pa rin si rody d. sa mga biktima sa mga na ejk nya. na sa icc na. filipino people should wait the verdict and we must respect the rule of law.
may pananagutan na daw pero wait pa pala haha ang saya
 
may pananagutan na daw pero wait pa pala haha ang saya
means is meron syang "rights" to answer sa korte, may tungkolin pa sya na dapat nya gampanan or pananagotan nya bilang isang commander in chief during ejk. answerable ang tatay mong si rody sa icc. e respeto mo naman ang tatay mo.
 
means is meron syang "rights" to answer sa korte, may tungkolin pa sya na dapat nya gampanan or pananagotan nya bilang isang commander in chief during ejk. answerable ang tatay mong si rody sa icc. e respeto mo naman ang tatay mo.
buti naman at klaro na maghihintay pa pala tayo hehe
 

About this Thread

  • 57
    Replies
  • 564
    Views
  • 11
    Participants
Last reply from:
philbog1

Trending Content

Online now

Members online
1,217
Guests online
1,529
Total visitors
2,746

Forum statistics

Threads
2,018,587
Posts
27,485,882
Members
1,632,177
Latest member
jg2803
Back
Top