Recent content by bandwagon

Sorry, I mistook your post as directed to me.

Kindly read my post with discernment.

Another propaganda. Not everything you say here is automatically true or let's be honest, you didn't exactly catch the reality of religion and science. Sabi nga ni Thea, pinipilit na paghiwalayin. This is not falso in uno, falso in toto (i refer to religion). You blame something for everything.

Di ko alam kung related sa thread na ito ang comment na ito. IMO, you may create another thread at baka may time ang iba na i criticize ang assertions mo.

@T Just want to amend and extend my message above. 1. You admitted hindi ka active sa religion mo ngayon. Why? a. Base ba sa problema sa pamilya o impluwensya ng mga ibang tao? Mapakaibigan o hindi kakilala? b. base ba sa mga nababaaa mo na literatura na sumasalungat sa iyong kinabibilangan...

Stick to the Church (RC). i'm agnostic..but between the two (RC and INC)...embrace RC but not of the sins or irrationalities you see in that religion..there are dark and gray areas in everything...

Can you substantiate your clain that Jesus(or at least the person who lived historically with that name) isn't "totally proven" na totoo? What do you mean by totally proven anyway. I am not here to defend the divinity of Jesus, but when you touch history, you must prove your claom otherwise.

I don't think you got my point after reading my entire previous posts in this thread. You like it or not, atheism is a belief system. Can you please re-read my posts and then make analytic juxtaposition of my ideas and your ideas point by point if necessary.

I'm sorry to say this friend but I think you are incorrectly following the recent conversations here. Neither Stellariim nor I claim that there is no other life forms elsewhere in the universe. We are open to that. However, this not the point. The point was that to say that " certainly" or...

Yes I am too naive that I don't know how the Post-Enlightenment killed God/s or theistic philosophy. Therefore, please enlighten me and lay down here the reasons why thay we may scrutinize it. You should not just say, because so and so that the Post-enlightenment period says so and so and...

This is redundant or I will redirect you to links that will somehow refute or challenge the source of informations you provide. Repetitious nonsense. IDT theory is not Creationism as you superficially understood. IDT does not assume that first, there must be a God or Creator and then from that...

Please enlighten me about this so called Post-Enlightenment and how this philosophical movement we are suppose to believe absolutely without critical analysis. The last time I checked the internet, voila God is coming back from the grave after Nietzsche and the 1960's. I don't argue that there...

Ignore what? Yes, you discussed this again and again according to your own erroneous and superficial terms. Therefore, again and again I will expose your biased assertion. You have the slightest idea of the Intelligent Design Theory. I am not an ID scientist nor an apologetic of that theory...

Yes, more rhetorics and repetitious nonsense. This is based on an erroneous notion that only the atheist has the monopoly on information and knowledge, logical and scientific thinking and philosophical discourses. Please wake up and properly frame the God debate.

Well said!